What is the Argument Principle in Complex Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bruno Tolentino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interpretation
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the ratio f'(x)/f(x) in complex analysis and its relevance in various fields such as control theory and information theory. It highlights that this ratio frequently appears due to its connection to the logarithmic derivative and the natural logarithm of the function f(x). The Argument Principle is introduced, stating that for a meromorphic function f(z) within a closed contour C, the number of zeros and poles inside C can be determined, assuming C is simple and counter-clockwise oriented. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical significance of this principle without attributing specific interpretations to individual contributors. Overall, the Argument Principle serves as a crucial tool in understanding the behavior of meromorphic functions in complex analysis.
Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Hi! I'd like to know of f'(x)/f(x) has some special interpretation, some physics or math concept related.

This ratio appears many times in control theory...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hehe, no idea. However, the inverse is where a linear approximation to f crosses the y-axis.
See also Newton-Raphson
 
Since its anti-derivative is ##ln|f(x)|## it's natural to often occur everywhere. However, that doesn't justify a special name. E.g. ##e^{- \frac{1}{2} x^2}## hasn't either.
 
It is the derivative of ##\log{(f)}##, ##\log##-transformations are used when there are quantities with exponential growth as in biology, control theory, in information theory as example ##\log{f}## is connected to the concept of entropy, ...
 
Bruno Tolentino said:
Hi! I'd like to know of f'(x)/f(x) has some special interpretation, some physics or math concept related.
In complex analysis, if f(z) is a meromorphic function inside and on some closed contour C, and f has no zeros or poles on C, then
180a6153463348f542e7aff593652e94.png

where N and P denote respectively the number of zeros and poles of f(z) inside the contour C, with each zero and pole counted as many times as its multiplicity and order, respectively, indicate. This statement of the theorem assumes that the contour C is simple, that is, without self-intersections, and that it is oriented counter-clockwise (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_principle).
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
16K
  • · Replies 292 ·
10
Replies
292
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K