MHB What is the basis for $F$ in linear algebra?

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Let $F$ be the set of infinite sequences $(a_1,a_2,a_3...)$, where $a_i \in \Bbb{R}$ that satisfy
$a_{i+3}=a_i+a_{i+1}+a_{i+2}$
This describes a finite-dimensional vector space. Determine a basis for $F$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is easy to see that any sequence $(a_i)$ is uniquely determined by its first three elements, so this vector space has dimension 3. A suitable basis is the set of the three sequences $x, y, z$ defined by:
$$x = (1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 4, \cdots)$$
$$y = (0, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, \cdots)$$
$$z = (0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 4, 7, \cdots)$$
i.e. $x$, $y$ and $z$ are the sequences defined by the first three elements $(1, 0, 0)$, $(0, 1, 0)$ and $(0, 0, 1)$ respectively. It's easy to see that the basis $\{ x, y, z \}$ is linearly independent, for suppose there exists $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3 \in \mathbb{R}$ such that:
$$\lambda_1 x + \lambda_2 y + \lambda_3 z = 0$$
Where $0$ is of course the zero sequence. But that would imply:
$$\lambda_1 (1, 0, 0, \cdots) + \lambda_2 (0, 1, 0, \cdots) + \lambda_3 (0, 0, 1, \cdots) = (0, 0, 0, \cdots)$$
That is:
$$(\lambda_1, 0, 0, \cdots) + (0, \lambda_2, 0, \cdots) + (0, 0, \lambda_3, \cdots) = (0, 0, 0, \cdots)$$
In other words, $\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = \lambda_3 = 0$ and so this set is linearly independent. Finally, it's easy to see that this set spans the entire vector space, since every sequence $(a_i)$ with first three elements $a_1, a_2, a_3$ can be written as:
$$a_1 x + a_2 y + a_3 z$$
Which is in the vector space and has its first three elements equal to $a_1, a_2, a_3$ and so must be equal to $(a_i)$. Therefore $\{ x, y, z \}$ is a basis of this vector space.
 
Last edited:
I hope you'll forgive me that I'm using isomorphisms of vector spaces. (Blush)

Let $f$ be the function $F \to \mathbb R^3$ given by $(a_1,a_2,a_3, ...) \mapsto (a_1,a_2,a_3)$.
Since all elements following $a_3$ are uniquely determined by $a_1,a_2,a_3$, $f$ is a bijection.
Moreover, since $F$ is a vector space, it follows that for all $x,y \in F, \lambda \in \mathbb R$ we have: $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ and $f(\lambda x) = \lambda f(x)$.
Thus $f$ is an isomorphism of vector spaces.

Since {(1,0,0), (0,1,0), (0,0,1)} is a basis for $\mathbb R^3$, it follows that {(1,0,0,...), (0,1,0,...), (0,0,1,...)} is a basis for $F$. (Nerd)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top