What is the best method for plotting complex inequalities on the complex plane?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for plotting the set of complex numbers defined by the inequality \{z \in C | |z - i| \leq |z-1|\} on the complex plane. Participants explore both geometric and algebraic approaches to understand and visualize this inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to evaluate specific values of z, such as z = 1 - 2i and z = 2 + 2i, to determine their validity in satisfying the inequality.
  • Another participant suggests using the representation of complex numbers in terms of x and y to analyze the inequality.
  • Some participants emphasize the geometric interpretation of the inequality, relating it to distances between points in the complex plane.
  • Others argue for an algebraic approach, stating that it can provide a more systematic method for solving the inequality.
  • There is a discussion about squaring both sides of the inequality to simplify the analysis, with some participants noting that this is a common technique in comparing absolute values.
  • A participant describes the geometric solution, identifying the perpendicular bisector of the line segment between the points i and 1 as critical to understanding the inequality.
  • Some participants express differing opinions on the effectiveness of geometric versus algebraic methods, with humor and light-hearted banter about the merits of each approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views on the best method for plotting the inequality, with some favoring geometric interpretations and others preferring algebraic techniques. There is no consensus on a single approach, as both methods are discussed and debated.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the potential limitations of using geometry if one is not familiar with the concepts, while others argue that algebra can sometimes be overly simplistic. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the participants' familiarity with the methods discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of complex analysis, particularly those interested in visualizing inequalities in the complex plane through different mathematical approaches.

username12345
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Trying to plot the set of complex numbers \{z \in C | |z - i| \leq |z-1|\} on the complex plane.

I've tried by hand a few values for z, such as z = 1 - 2i, z = 2 + 2i, but the inequality isn't true.

How can I determine which values of z are true for this inequality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure z=2+2i doesn't satisfy the inequality? :wink:

If you let z=x+iy and remember that |x+iy|=\sqrt{x^2+y^2} you should be able to get your answer in terms of x and y.
 
username12345 said:
Trying to plot the set of complex numbers \{z \in C | |z - i| \leq |z-1|\} on the complex plane.

Hi username12345! :smile:

Just pretend it's geometry

if i and 1 are points, what words would you use to describe, geometrically, |z - i| ≤ |z - 1|? :wink:
 
To add to tiny-tim's hint: |b- a|, geometrically, is the distance between point a and b.
 
Mentallic said:
Are you sure z=2+2i doesn't satisfy the inequality? :wink:

Sorry, I've been staring at maths all weekend it's starting to all look the same.

Yeah it will be true because the displacement is the same on both axis. \sqrt(2^2 + 1^2) = \sqrt(1^2 + 2^2) :smile:

I will have to return to this problem later, my head hurts. Thanks for your help everyone.
 
I don't like to oppose a mentor's suggestion, but I try to avoid geometry whenever possible, especially when algebra provides a perfectly feasible solution. If you don't feel the same way, of course, just ignore my ramblings. (geometry in this case would be simpler, but that is only if you know where you are going with it. Algebra is a simple, fool proof step-by-step process)

\{z \in C | |z - i| \leq |z-1|\}

So if we let z=x+iy and substitute into the original question: |x+iy-i| \leq |x+iy-1|
and collect real and imaginary terms: |x+i(y-1)| \leq |(x-1)+iy|

Remember that: |a+ib|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}

So now if we follow this rule, we have: \sqrt{x^2+(y-1)^2} \leq \sqrt{(x-1)^2+y^2}

and now you can simplify this inequality in terms of x and y. This will give you the cartesian inequality, but it is equivalent and can be copy-pasted onto the argand diagram.
 
Nice one, Mentallic! :smile:

and you can use squares throughout, to avoid the √ at the end :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Nice one, Mentallic! :smile:

and you can use squares throughout, to avoid the √ at the end :wink:

Darn this internet world. I'm detecting a hint of sarcasm, but can't be truly sure o:)
The 2nd line really threw me off.

I know my recommended solution is silly and inferior compared to the simple geometry of this problem, but it's these silly moves that keep it interesting :smile:
 
Mentallic, the second line just means noting |a|<|b| if and only if |a|2<|b|2 so your last line becomes

x^2+(y-1)^2} \leq \sqrt{(x-1)^2+y^2

It's fairly common when comparing absolute values to square them first because the algebra is always nicer at the end (in this case, you can just square both sides after getting rid of the absolute value signs, but it's good to know as a general rule)
 
  • #10
boo!

Mentallic said:
Darn this internet world. I'm detecting a hint of sarcasm, but can't be truly sure o:)
The 2nd line really threw me off.

I'm detecting paranoia :wink: …​

my solution was a bit hand-wavy …

but yours is entirely analytic …

which in an analysis problem is actually quite appropriate! :biggrin:
 
  • #11
Office_Shredder said:
Mentallic, the second line just means noting |a|<|b| if and only if |a|2<|b|2 so your last line becomes

x^2+(y-1)^2} \leq \sqrt{(x-1)^2+y^2

It's fairly common when comparing absolute values to square them first because the algebra is always nicer at the end (in this case, you can just square both sides after getting rid of the absolute value signs, but it's good to know as a general rule)
Oh yeah. Since x and y are real, and the square root suggests they are positive, squaring both sides of the inequality is no problem.

tiny-tim said:
I'm detecting paranoia :wink: …​

my solution was a bit hand-wavy …

but yours is entirely analytic …

which in an analysis problem is actually quite appropriate! :biggrin:
Why just stop there? I'm also feeling depression, lack of self-esteem and gastric bowel troubles :-p
No but honestly, I just felt that my method was so simple-minded that you were simply mocking it :wink:

I'm glad you agree and please, sign a petition to ban the use of geometry :biggrin:
 
  • #12
support CAMREG!

Mentallic said:
I'm glad you agree and please, sign a petition to ban the use of geometry :biggrin:

oooh no … i like to sneak geometry in wherever i can! :biggrin:

support CAMREG!
the CAMpaign for REal Geometry :approve:
 
  • #13
Geometry to understand and the algebra to compute ought to be the moral.

It may also help to plot the equality first, then decide which of the two regions the plane is separated into corresponds to the given inequality (the other part of the plane will correspond to the reverse inequality).
 
  • #14
Here's my geometry solution: |z- i| is the distance from the point z= x+ iy and the point i. |z-1| is the distance from the point z= x+ iy to the point 1. The set of points for which |z- i|= |z- 1| is the perpendicular bisector of the line segment between i and 1. The set of points for which |z-i|\le |z- 1| is the set of points above and to the left of that bisector. That should be sufficient to plot the set which was what was required.

If you want more than that, go to Cartesian geometry: the segment from (0, 1) to (1, 0) has midpoint (1/2, 1/2) and slope -1. The perpendicular must have slope 1 and pass through (1/2, 1/2): y= x. The set of points such that |z-i|\le|z-1| is \{x+ iy | x\le y\}.

I don't believe all that algebra was simper or more accurate than that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K