What Is the Best Software for Designing Military and Commercial Aircraft?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the best software options for designing military and commercial aircraft, with a focus on transonic and hypersonic designs. Participants share their experiences and preferences regarding various software tools, including CATIA, AutoCAD, and others, while clarifying the distinction between modeling and design processes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in designing a transonic or hypersonic military aircraft and seeks recommendations for suitable software, mentioning prior experience with MatLab and AAA (darcorp).
  • Another participant questions whether the design project will lead to actual construction.
  • Concerns are raised about the high costs of professional software, which can run into tens of thousands of dollars.
  • Some participants advocate for CATIA V6 as a leading software, while others argue it is primarily a modeling tool and may not be sufficient for comprehensive aircraft design.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of initial conceptualization and calculations before transitioning to software like CATIA for detailed design adjustments.
  • Participants note that different software packages serve various purposes, and there is no universally "best" software; rather, the choice depends on specific project needs and user familiarity.
  • One participant mentions that Airbus and Boeing use a variety of software, including custom solutions, and emphasizes that ease of use can vary significantly between different applications.
  • A later post introduces a new question about designing commercial aircraft like the A340 or Boeing 777, seeking software recommendations for a non-commercial design project.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best software for aircraft design. There are multiple competing views regarding the capabilities of CATIA and other software, as well as differing opinions on the importance of modeling versus design processes.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for initial calculations and conceptual work before using advanced software, indicating a potential limitation in understanding the full design process. Additionally, the discussion reflects varying definitions of what constitutes "design" in the context of software capabilities.

slm51986
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I will soon be starting to design either a transonic or hypersonic military aircraft.
I'm just curious what software would be best to use, I have previous experience with MatLab and AAA (darcorp).
I'm not sure if AAA will be able to work correctly at those speeds.
Any help would be great, thanks :cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you be more specific. Are you going to actually built this vehicle?
 
Sorry, the project will only be a design project so I won't be building it.
 
How much money do you have, you do realize these software run in the tens of thousands of dollars?
 
catia v6 is the best
 
jags said:
catia v6 is the best

For what?
 
CATIA V6 (or V5) is just a modeling software. its the best one available in the market, probably. Although it possesses the ability to do structural analysis, it won't be much of a help in 'DESIGNING' a plane.
Designing to me is what they taught in TA101 :) Its about the whole idea of engineering a product, right from the dimensions of the wing to the kind of powerplant needed and a whole lot of stuff. and for this, you should consult Aircraft Design by Dan Raymer and try using the software which comes along. modelling would be the next step in designing adn for that i recommend CATIA V5.
 
Designing what?

There is no "best" software packages. Software is a tool. It's like saying there is a best pencil or best calculator. It makes no sense.
 
I'm going to make an engineering program called "the best software". That way, when people ask, there is no doubt which one is the best. :rolleyes:
 
  • #10
ABHIdAVIATOR said:
CATIA V6 (or V5) is just a modeling software. its the best one available in the market, probably. Although it possesses the ability to do structural analysis, it won't be much of a help in 'DESIGNING' a plane.
Designing to me is what they taught in TA101 :) Its about the whole idea of engineering a product, right from the dimensions of the wing to the kind of powerplant needed and a whole lot of stuff. and for this, you should consult Aircraft Design by Dan Raymer and try using the software which comes along. modelling would be the next step in designing adn for that i recommend CATIA V5.

hey abhidaviator then why these softwares are called design and drafting .You said its only for modeling ,u r totally wrong man .There are aproximately 84 modules in catia v6, modeling is one of them.
 
  • #11
Might I remind everyone we use full, proper English here. :wink:
 
  • #12
jags said:
hey abhidaviator then why these softwares are called design and drafting .You said its only for modeling ,u r totally wrong man .There are aproximately 84 modules in catia v6, modeling is one of them.

Ya, you're right jags. CATIA offers more than just modelling. But that's when you're done with the initial, gross calculations. only when you have finished conceptualising using a paper and a calculator, shifting to a software like CATIA is useful. One can't start with CATIA right in the concept development stage of the project. But once its done, CAD softwares help a lot in making minute and important adjustments to the design as required by the product's structural and ergonomic requirements.

But these days, the starting 'conceptualisation' can also be done on softwares, which are nothing but some mathematical formulae embedded inside the code to make the job easier and to some extent, predict the required modifications in design.
 
  • #13
slm51986 said:
I will soon be starting to design either a transonic or hypersonic military aircraft.
I'm just curious what software would be best to use, I have previous experience with MatLab and AAA (darcorp).
I'm not sure if AAA will be able to work correctly at those speeds.
Any help would be great, thanks :cool:

Use the software they provide at your workplace. If there is none there, quit immediately.

If you're just doing some modeling for watever reason, at previously said there is CATIA, then AutoCAD, EPro etc...

I think we have yet to understand what you mean.
 
  • #14
One can't go wrong with Catia can they, airbus use it.

I have been told that Boeing still use custom Fortran coded software for some areas, this was by a Boeing Employee, so guessing its right (didnt say what application though, just simulation areas)

Airbus too use MSC software, Delcam, Dassult, Hyperworks + Altair offerings.

Best software like said, not such thing.

However, i would argue some software could be called better as its easier to use, but this would be down to the end application.

Pro/E to me is far harder to use than Catia, but on the same leaf, i still use Pro/E as its got its uses.

Catia with an FEA + CFD package could be used for structure + design

Matlab + simulink + flightgear can be used to code systems, and do simulations for systems.

Never used or heard of AAA Darcop, can fill me in on if its any good if you so wish.
 
  • #15
Hello

I have a question: I want to design an Airplane like a A340, A330, A380, Boeing 747, Boeing 777, and so on... So what Software would you recommend me to buy or use? I would like to design the airplane from the inside (and outside). The design won't be realized it's just for fun.
I am very happy about every response..

Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K