What is the best training strategy for success on the Putnam Exam?

  • Context: Testing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on strategies for success in the Putnam Exam, exploring the necessary prerequisites, effective training methods, and the nature of the exam itself. Participants share their experiences and insights regarding the mathematical background and problem-solving skills required for the exam.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assertion that only Calculus is needed for the Putnam exam, suggesting that this claim is misleading.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of problem-solving ability over specific courses, mentioning that knowledge of Abstract Algebra may be necessary for certain problems.
  • It is proposed that a background in Calculus I-III, Linear Algebra, and possibly Number Theory could prepare someone for approximately 80% of the exam content, though success in solving problems is not guaranteed.
  • Some participants note that additional mathematical knowledge, even from basic courses, can be beneficial for solving problems, citing examples from past exams.
  • A participant shares their personal experience with old exams, indicating that while basic math skills are required, ingenuity is crucial for success.
  • A newcomer to the Putnam competition discusses their training strategy of analyzing problems and solutions to improve understanding of mathematical problem-solving.
  • The participant also highlights the perceived difficulty of the exam, noting that even the "easy questions" can be quite challenging.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessary prerequisites for the Putnam exam, with some emphasizing the importance of specific courses while others focus on problem-solving skills. There is no consensus on what constitutes the best training strategy, as various approaches are suggested.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that the median score for the Putnam exam is often very low, indicating the exam's difficulty. There are references to specific mathematical concepts and problem types that may or may not be essential for success, reflecting a range of opinions on the prerequisites.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students preparing for the Putnam Exam, educators seeking insights into effective training strategies, and anyone interested in competitive mathematics.

Dens
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Could anyone Putnam veterans or Putnam coaches tell me what the real per-requisites are to succeed in the Putnam exam? Because they say the Putnam exam only requires Calculus and I think that's completely garbage.

What courses should one have in his arsenal if he wishes to be successful in the exam? Consider the person who has never really entered any Math competition before.

Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its not the courses you should worry about. Instead, you need an amazing problem solving ability. Granted, if you haven't studied Abstract Algebra yet, you probably will not be able to approach those types of problems but for the rest, Calc I-III, Linear Algebra and, maybe, Number Theory will put you in position to attempt about 80% of the content. Whether the attempt is successful is another question.

So, best suggestion is to download old exams and play around with them. If you can solve them, then good. If you cannot, but easily understand the solutions, increase problem solving ability. If you can't even understand solutions, you are probably missing some courses.
 
Dens said:
Because they say the Putnam exam only requires Calculus and I think that's completely garbage.
It sounds right to me.

Additional knowledge of all sorts can be very helpful -- after all, what's the point of taking classes if it doesn't make it easier to solve problems? But generally not required.

Additional knowledge isn't restricted to advanced courses: I recall one A1 problem that was very simple if you learned (and remembered) about the Euler line from plane geometry.

In my opinion, A1 and B1 problems usually have straightforward, elementary solutions. Note I did not say "easy" or "simple". If the median score is still 0 as it was when I took the exam, being able to solve either A1 or B1 counts as being successful.
 
I haven't taken the putnam but I've played around with lots of the old exams. They really do for the most part require basic math skills - calculus, LA, diff eq - but in ways that require a lot of ingenuity.
 
Hey, I will also be participating in the Putnam competition this December (as an incoming freshman). I found a site with questions and their solutions for EVERY Putnam competition: http://mks.mff.cuni.cz/kalva/putnam.html.

From what I have heard and the from the problems I've tried this is an outrageously difficult exam. The "easy questions" seem nearly impossible (even considering that you get an average of 30 minutes to write up each solution). Furthermore, the median score for the Putnam is a 0 or a 1 out of a possible 120 (depending on the year).

However, I found a training strategy that seems to help. That is, I read a problem and a solution of an exam question and then I write down how one might have conjured up the solution. I do one of these a day and it seems to be helping (at the very least, I understand more about how mathematics is done).

Good luck!

EDIT: The site I gave you only had all the problems up to 2003. Newer problems (1985-2012) and solutions can be found on the official Putnam website.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K