What is the black that we see in the night sky?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the blackness observed in the night sky, exploring various interpretations and implications of what "black" means in this context. Participants examine the visibility of celestial objects, the limitations of human perception, and the role of different wavelengths of light in detection. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, observational challenges, and the effects of distance on visibility.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that blackness in the night sky can be attributed to the absence of photons reaching the observer's eyes.
  • Others argue that objects become undetectable as they appear smaller with increasing distance, leading to regions of perceived blackness.
  • A participant questions whether black is a lack of detectable objects or a different phenomenon altogether.
  • It is suggested that blackness could be relative to the sensitivity of different sensors to various wavelengths of light.
  • Some participants note that all objects emit some radiation, and even black holes have a slight glow due to Hawking radiation.
  • There is mention of the cosmic microwave background as a source of faint radiation that fills the universe, challenging the notion of a truly black sky.
  • Participants discuss the limitations of human vision and how light pollution affects the visibility of celestial objects.
  • Some assert that only a few celestial objects can be resolved by the naked eye, while others emphasize the importance of brightness and wavelength in visibility.
  • Dark nebulae are identified as interstellar clouds that can obscure light from objects behind them, contributing to the perception of blackness in certain areas of the sky.
  • A participant explains that the blue sky during the day is due to Rayleigh scattering, contrasting with the black sky at night.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of blackness in the night sky, with no consensus reached on the underlying reasons or implications. The discussion remains unresolved, with various hypotheses and interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on human perception and the specific definitions of "black." The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical and observational challenges related to the visibility of distant objects.

Meruem
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Can black means many thing?
Summary: Can black means many thing?

The black we see in night sky has to mean many things
First of all, from point of views of human eyes then the photons can't reach our eyes so it appears black.
Secondly, the objects appear smaller as we go farther from that object. So, at some point object won't be detected. And for the observer or the detector lying beyond that point sees nothing an it appears as black.
Or, what is black ? Is it something we can't detect? or there exist nothing where we see black? or, is it something else?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Meruem said:
from point of views of human eyes then the photons can't reach our eyes so it appears black.

Yes. And this is the response to everything else you say in your post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
Will the body won't be visible at some point in space if the object continues to appear smaller at increasing distance?
 
Meruem said:
Will the body won't be visible at some point in space if the object continues to appear smaller at increasing distance?

Obviously if an object is far enough away we won't be able to see it, yes.
 
Moderator's note: Thread level changed to "B".
 
Meruem said:
The black we see in night sky
Can we objectively SEE black?
If I put you in a dark room with visible light below the threshold that your eyes could detect ...

Yet, there are photons traversing that space on either side of the visible spectrum that devices other than our eyes can detect. Describing something as being "black" could considered as being relative to the sensitivity of the sensor to particular wavelengths of light.
 
That's why astronomers use telescopes.
 
No object can ever be black. All bodies are leaking radiation. You might not be able to detect it with your eyes (the number of photons may be too low or the energies can be too high/lower) but it's always radiating. Even black holes have a very slight glow of Hawking radiation. Even if that weren't true, the universe itself has an afterglow from the big bang. It's in every direction and mostly homogenous, lookup the cosmic microwave background. The night sky isn't black, it's faintly glowing in microwave.
 
Meruem said:
Will the body won't be visible at some point in space if the object continues to appear smaller at increasing distance?
Not exactly. All of the objects we see in space are too small to be seen with the naked eye except two or three. Everything else we see as just points of light. So all of these other objects become invisible to the naked eye when they are so far away that they become too dim to see.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #10
Meruem said:
Summary: Can black means many thing?

The black we see in night sky has to mean many things
First of all, from point of views of human eyes then the photons can't reach our eyes so it appears black.
Secondly, the objects appear smaller as we go farther from that object. So, at some point object won't be detected. And for the observer or the detector lying beyond that point sees nothing an it appears as black.
Or, what is black ? Is it something we can't detect? or there exist nothing where we see black? or, is it something else?
Black in a scene snap shot forms an image in your mind so it is a "thing" in this sense.
Black tells us something about a scene and is important from an evolutionary point of view.
An astronomer will conclude, black hole nothing there or I need a more powerful telescope .
 
  • #11
Meruem said:
Will the body won't be visible at some point in space if the object continues to appear smaller at increasing distance?
The apparent size is less important. It's all about how much light it's belting out, and what the wavelength of the light is. We can definitely see objects that are far too small to be resolved by our eyes, as long as they are sufficiently bright compared to their surroundings. This is the case with all stars beyond our Sun: they're far, far too small for our eyes to resolve. To the extent that they appear to have any shape at all, it's because of optics which spread out their images in our eyes.

The wavelength is important as well because we can only observe light in a narrow band of wavelengths. If the wavelengths are too short or too long, we won't be able to see them with our eyes. Gamma ray bursts are an example of events which are simply too high-energy for us to observe (short wavelength = high energy). There are also a number of sources that put out x-rays.

Similarly, there are objects putting out radiation whose wavelength is too low, such as the supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy (Sagittarius A*): the matter around this black hole emits radio waves that we also can't see. We can build sensors to observe the sky at every wavelength, and every wavelength that we observe shows us entirely new things.

For brightness, our eyes are only so sensitive. And the further away an object is, the dimmer it gets. Worse, if there are lights around us on Earth (such as street lights), our eyes won't adjust and we'll be unable to see the dimmer objects in the sky we could see from a darker location. If you've never seen the expanse of the Milky Way spread across the night sky, I definitely recommend taking a trip away from civilization to view it.

With telescopes, we can deal with the visibility of far-away objects by viewing the same portion of sky for a long period of time. It also helps to get away from the atmosphere, as with the Hubble Telescope, as the atmosphere obscures observation. Larger telescopes also help, as there's a larger light-collecting area to work with.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #12
Meruem said:
Can black means many thing?

Yes. All the things mentioned in the above replies plus:
Stars that are so far away that their light has not reached us yet (since they began their fusion process), or anything beyond the distance of the visible universe (about 13.8 billion light years) -- that is before anything began to emit light.
Meruem said:
Secondly, the objects appear smaller as we go farther from that object. So, at some point object won't be detected.

As mentioned in other replies only a few things can be resolved to a size. There is one galaxy that you can actually see with you naked eye, the Andromeda Galaxy, which has a resolvable size. But even with a big telescope, only a few stars have been resolved to a size. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stars_with_resolved_images

Also, dark nebulae are a type of interstellar cloud that can obscure the light from objects behind them. You can see these dark patches in the Milky Way when there is no light pollution in the night sky.
 
  • #13
Also...

The reason why we don't we a black sky during the day is because light from the Sun hits small molecules of nitrogen and oxygen in the atmosphere and gets scattered. This is called Rayleigh scattering. This is why the sky is blue during the day and black at night (when the atmosphere is in the Earth's shadow.)

Where there is no atmosphere, like on the moon, the sky is always black.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
russ_watters said:
All of the objects we see in space are too small to be seen with the naked eye except two or three.
I don't think you meant that. Two or three hundred, on an only moderately good night are visible and resolvable by the naked eye. I think it would be a good idea to replace "small" with "subtend extremely small angles". Apart from a few Solar System objects, all the rest are 'point sources' (effectively). The optics of the eye tend to make the brighter stars look larger.

'Black' is a very loose term because it really means 'below the threshold of the detecting instrument'. A telescope with more gathering power will see things in a 'black' region.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K