What Is the Capacitance of Coaxial Infinite Cylinders?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the capacitance of two coaxial infinite cylinders, with a focus on the relationship between their radii and the resulting capacitance. The original poster is exploring the implications of making the radii infinitesimally small to achieve an infinite configuration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the capacitance based on a formula for finite cylinders and questions the validity of their approach when considering infinite cylinders. They express uncertainty about handling the logarithmic expression when the radii approach zero.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in clarifying the original poster's assumptions about the problem, particularly regarding the significance of the cylinders' lengths and the concept of capacitance per unit length. There is an ongoing exploration of how to properly interpret the problem without reaching a consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding whether the problem is asking for capacitance per unit length, which could affect the interpretation of the results. The original poster's approach to minimizing the radii is also under scrutiny, as it leads to indeterminate forms in their calculations.

Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have two coaxial infinite cylinders and I must find their capacitance, where [tex]r_{1} < r_{2}[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I got an answer (for finite cylinders) that is inversely proportional to [tex]Ln (r_{1}/r_{2})[/tex].

Assuming this answer is correct (if someone can check it), in order to make it infinite the two radii have to become infinitesimally small (0) correct? If I do this though, I get an indeterminate in the argument of log.

Have I done this wrong or must I rewrite my expression in terms of some approximate expansion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Are you sure the problem isn't asking you for the capacitance per unit length?
 


I am sure. I don't see how significant that is either, since I would just divide my expression by [tex]l[/tex]. But, the road block at the moment is trying to infinitesimally minimize the radii so as to give me a finite solution.
 


It's significant because the reason you get an infinite answer is because [itex]l[/itex] is infinite. Typically, this type of question asks you for the capacitance per unit length, which is a finite number.
 


Void123 said:
in order to make it infinite the two radii have to become infinitesimally small (0) correct?

No, in order two make the two cylinders infinitely long, you just make them longer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K