What is the change in kinetic energy for a block attached to a stretched spring?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a block attached to a spring, where the spring is initially stretched and then released, causing the block to move across a rough surface. The objective is to determine the change in kinetic energy of the block as it interacts with the spring and the frictional forces at play.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the work done by the spring and the work done by friction, questioning how to accurately calculate the change in potential energy and its implications for kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the calculations needed to find the change in energy, with some suggesting that the work done by friction should equal the change in potential energy of the spring. There is an ongoing examination of the correct values for initial and final positions, as well as the implications of friction on energy transfer.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the exact distances involved in the calculations, particularly the total distance traveled by the block and how it affects the work done by friction. Additionally, the presence of friction complicates the energy transfer dynamics, leading to further questions about the coefficients involved.

pleasehelpme6
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A relaxed spring with spring constant k = 70 N/m is stretched a distance di = 63 cm and held there. A block of mass M = 7 kg is attached to the spring. The spring is then released from rest and contracts, dragging the block across a rough horizontal floor until it stops without passing through the relaxed position, at which point the spring is stretched by an amount df = di/7.

Homework Equations



W = F*d
KE = 1/2 k*x^2
KE = 1/2 m*v^2

The Attempt at a Solution



All I need is to find the change in kinetic energy, but i haven't been able to get the right value yet.

I tried to find the change in kinetic energy by using 1/2kx^2, using .63 m as x, also trying 0.63 - 0.09 m as x, but i haven't gotten the right value for change in KE.

Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you need to find? Because they said the surface was 'rough' means that energy is lost due to friction.
 
Well, in order to answer this I need to find the Work done by friction, which means I would first need the Work done by the spring, but I'm not sure how to find that.
 
pleasehelpme6 said:
Well, in order to answer this I need to find the Work done by friction, which means I would first need the Work done by the spring, but I'm not sure how to find that.

Right then.

Well you do want to find a change in energy, but it is not kinetic energy.

Initially it is stretched, so the mass will have 0 KE. At the final value of compression (di/7), the mass also has 0 KE. But there is a change in energy, which you calculated. Shouldn't this change in potential energy be associated with the frictional force?
 
Yes, but I have not idea how to find that change in energy.

I tried deltaE = 1/2kx^2 (initial) - 1/2kx^2 (final)

If that's not right then I have no idea.

But then wouldn't that change in energy = Work by friction?
 
pleasehelpme6 said:
Yes, but I have not idea how to find that change in energy.

I tried deltaE = 1/2kx^2 (initial) - 1/2kx^2 (final)

If that's not right then I have no idea.

But then wouldn't that change in energy = Work by friction?

Yes but what are you using as xfinal and xinitial?
 
Efinal = 1/2*(70)*(.63/7)^2
Einitial = 1/2*(70)*(.63)^2

xfinal = .63/7 m
xinitial = .63 m

would the equation then be, Work by friction = M*(Normal)*(.63/7) = Efinal - Einitial ?
 
The work done by friction would be equal to the change in the Spring's potential energy. In a frictionless situation, this drop in potential energy would translate into an increase in kinetic energy. Since we have friction, the block is slowed down and the energy that initially went to kinetic energy is eventually taken away by friction.
 
Then how do you find the change in potential energy? The only equation I know is PE = mgh, and since the h does not change this is no help.
 
  • #10
pleasehelpme6 said:
Efinal = 1/2*(70)*(.63/7)^2
Einitial = 1/2*(70)*(.63)^2

xfinal = .63/7 m
xinitial = .63 m

would the equation then be, Work by friction = M*(Normal)*(.63/7) = Efinal - Einitial ?

Yes, the work done by friction should be that, unless I am missing something. Although the distance the block travels is no 0.63/7 m
 
  • #11
no, but that is the final distance. the total distance traveled would be .63 - .64/7, right?

does that affect the equation?
 
  • #12
pleasehelpme6 said:
Efinal = 1/2*(70)*(.63/7)^2
Einitial = 1/2*(70)*(.63)^2

Note that the potential energy is actually

[tex]U_{spring}(x)=\frac{1}{2}k(x-x_{equilibrium})^{2}[/tex]

but we can set [tex]x_{equilibrium}=0[/tex] in this case so that what you have above is ok.
 
  • #13
pleasehelpme6 said:
no, but that is the final distance. the total distance traveled would be .63 - .64/7, right?

does that affect the equation?

It does not affect the change in potential energy part.

From equilibrium to initial is 0.63m. From equilibrium to final is 0.09m

0.09----0------0.63

What would be the total distance?
 
  • #14
pleasehelpme6 said:
Efinal = 1/2*(70)*(.63/7)^2
Einitial = 1/2*(70)*(.63)^2

xfinal = .63/7 m
xinitial = .63 m

would the equation then be, Work by friction = M*(Normal)*(.63/7) = Efinal - Einitial ?

I realize what I did now, the final equation should be

Work by friction = M*(Normal)*(.63 - .63/7) = Efinal - Einitial

because it's the change in distance. This works, thanks a ton!
 
  • #15
pleasehelpme6 said:
I realize what I did now, the final equation should be

Work by friction = M*(Normal)*(.63 - .63/7) = Efinal - Einitial

because it's the change in distance. This works, thanks a ton!

Don't forget the coefficient of kinetic friction:

[tex]W_{fric}=\vec{F_{fric}}\cdot\vec{\Delta x}=-\mu_{kin}F_{normal}(\Delta x)=-\mu_{kin}mg(\Delta x)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K