What is the commutator of position and momentum squared in quantum mechanics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the commutator of position and momentum squared in quantum mechanics, specifically [\hat X, \hat P^2]. Participants are exploring the implications of the momentum operator and its squared form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the definition of P^2 and its implications for the commutator calculation. Some participants question the complexity of the results obtained and suggest alternative representations to simplify the process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing feedback on each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of the momentum operator, and there is an exploration of different approaches to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the Hamiltonian's definition involving the P^2 operator, and participants are considering the implications of using different representations in their calculations.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement



Calculate [tex][\hat X, \hat P^2][/tex].

Homework Equations


[tex][\hat A, \hat B] \Psi =[\hat A \hat B - \hat B \hat A ] \Psi[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused by [tex]P^2[/tex].
P is worth [tex]-i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/tex].
So I believe [tex]P^2= \hbar ^2 \left ( \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right ) ^2[/tex].
If so, I get that [tex][\hat X, \hat P^2]= \hbar ^2 \left [ x \left ( \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right ) ^2 -\Psi ^2 - 2x \Psi \frac {\partial \Psi}{\partial x} - x^2 \left ( \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right )^2 \right ][/tex].
However if by [tex]\hat P ^2[/tex] they mean [tex]\hbar ^2 \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}[/tex], then I get [tex][\hat X, \hat P^2]=-2 \hbar ^2 \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}[/tex].
I think my first approach was correct, but the answer I get seems way too complicated. I would like a feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It should the the latter.

[tex] \hbar ^2 \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}[/tex]

The Hamiltonian is often defined with the "P^2" operator.

While not all that physically meaningful, it's interesting to see what P^3 gives... (and so on)
 
Last edited:
Oh, thank you. I wasn't aware of that.
I'd like to know if I got a logical result, if it's not too much asked. :smile:
In all cases I'll redo the algebra tomorrow.
 
Oh yeah, the result is correct, and I guess see my edit that just made if you are curious.
 
Or you could change to impulse representation where the momentum operator acts on [tex]\psi (k)[/tex] the same as the position operator acts on [tex]\psi (x)[/tex] in coordinate representation :) That way you need not mess with derivatives.

But in the end you get the same result ;) So I guess it's the matter of which way is easier to you...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
449
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K