What Is The Complete ((everything Theory))

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter abdullahbameh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complete Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a "Theory of Everything," exploring the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity, as well as the potential for unifying these theories. Participants examine the contradictions between the two frameworks and speculate on the implications for a comprehensive theory that encompasses all fundamental forces.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that quantum mechanics and relativity are fundamentally contradictory, suggesting that if one is correct, the other cannot be, which raises questions about the existence of a unified theory.
  • Others argue that the historical debates between figures like Einstein and Bohr indicate that quantum mechanics has been refined over time, suggesting a shared foundation between quantum mechanics and relativity.
  • A viewpoint is presented that a Theory of Everything should unify general relativity with quantum physics, explaining the relationships among the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces.
  • Some participants mention that Sir Roger Penrose believes both general relativity and quantum physics will need modifications for reconciliation, with a suggestion that general relativity may face more significant changes.
  • There is a discussion about whether a Theory of Everything should include all four fundamental forces: strong nuclear, weak nuclear, electromagnetism, and gravity, with some participants questioning if gravitational force was overlooked in earlier statements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the compatibility of quantum mechanics and general relativity, with no consensus on whether a unified theory is achievable or what it should encompass. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of a Theory of Everything.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference historical debates and the evolution of theories without resolving the implications of these discussions for a unified theory. There are assumptions about the nature of the contradictions between quantum mechanics and relativity that are not fully explored.

abdullahbameh
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
is this theory is made of quantuam mechanics as husband and relativity as wife and is the existence of this theory is possible and when you think it will be published??!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I am aware, both theories cannot be correct, if one is found to be correct then the other cannot be correct as they are both contradictory. It would be impossible to predict when, that is if a theory of everything even exists.
 
you might be right but!

_Mayday_ said:
As far as I am aware, both theories cannot be correct, if one is found to be correct then the other cannot be correct as they are both contradictory. It would be impossible to predict when, that is if a theory of everything even exists.


But i think if you have read the argument between Albert Einstein and BOHAR you will see that einstein corrected more and more quanuam mechanics by his argument in its subjects and the physics that we study is sharing between QUANTUAM AND RELATIVITY
you might be correct in a thing that they are contradictory in non zero probability of quantuam and determinant of relativity.
 
abdullahbameh said:
But i think if you have read the argument between Albert Einstein and BOHAR you will see that einstein corrected more and more quanuam mechanics by his argument in its subjects and the physics that we study is sharing between QUANTUAM AND RELATIVITY

We study both Quantum and Relativity, but what I am saying is that both cannot co-exist in a Unification Theory.
 
Theory of everything = unification of General Theory of gravity and Quantum physics (which explains how the three forces: Strong, Weak and electromagnetism are related to each other).
 
Sir Roger Penrose says that he thinks both GR and quantum physics will have to be modified before they can be reconciled. He may be right, but I'm betting that GR will take the bigger hit by far. Einstein's failure to accommodate EM within GR troubled him greatly, and it hints at a fundamental incompleteness in GR.
 
malawi_glenn said:
Theory of everything = unification of General Theory of gravity and Quantum physics (which explains how the three forces: Strong, Weak and electromagnetism are related to each other).

But wouldn’t a theory of everything explain and relate all of the forces strong, weak, electromagnetism and gravitational! Or did u just forget to type gravitational? I'm sure you know more on the subjest than I do!
 
Maybe you're thinking of "The Theory of Almost Everything"
 
malawi_glenn said:
Theory of everything = unification of General Theory of gravity and Quantum physics (which explains how the three forces: Strong, Weak and electromagnetism are related to each other).

I would have thought a Theory of Everything would include all 4 forces:

Strong Nuclear Force
Weak Nuclear Force
Electromagnetism
Gravity
 

Similar threads

Graduate Implications of a "theory of everything"
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Can ChatGPT Handle Complex Physics Questions Accurately?
  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
17K
What's Your Favorite Scientific Theory?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Graduate Can quantum mechanics be combined with game theory?
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Graduate A couple of long questions on positivity bounds for UV-complete EFTs
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Graduate How were you exposed to probability theory in physics?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate What would be the impact of the discovery of the Graviton in the world?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Singularity structure being valid for all QFTs?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Graduate Clarification regarding argument in EPR paper
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
Graduate Is Fatio–Le Sage's theory of gravitation an entropic gravity?
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K