What is the concept behind varying resistance in a voltage divider circuit?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of varying resistance in a voltage divider circuit, specifically in relation to a potentiometer. Participants are examining how the position of the wiper affects resistance and voltage distribution across the terminals.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the wiper's position and the resistance between terminals in a potentiometer setup. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of resistance changes as the wiper moves and how this affects voltage drop.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaged in clarifying the underlying principles of resistance in relation to the wiper's movement. There is an ongoing exploration of how the resistance between the wiper and the terminals changes, with some participants providing insights into the physical properties of the potentiometer.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of resistance in a voltage divider without reaching a consensus on specific interpretations. The conversation includes references to equations related to resistance and the physical characteristics of the potentiometer.

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Dear Members,
I have attached two diagrams found in Voltage divider topic found in web , while discussing about potentiometer . My doubt is, in the first attachment( Voltage Divider.png) when the wiper( the one with arrow mark) is moved towards the top, that is towards the terminal 1, it has been mentioned terminal 1 will have less resistance and terminal 2 will have more resistance.
Similarly, if the wiper is moved towards terminal 2, terminal 2 will have less resistance than terminal 1. What is the concept involved here?

Going by the same argument, in my second attachment(Voltage Divider1.png), the wiper is moved down, the dark black point in the diagram should have less resistance and more current, so more voltage drop. Am i interpreted the second diagram correctly?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



 

Attachments

  • voltage divider.png
    voltage divider.png
    3 KB · Views: 469
  • voltage divider1.png
    voltage divider1.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 455
Physics news on Phys.org
logearav said:
My doubt is, in the first attachment( Voltage Divider.png) when the wiper( the one with arrow mark) is moved towards the top, that is towards the terminal 1, it has been mentioned terminal 1 will have less resistance and terminal 2 will have more resistance.
Similarly, if the wiper is moved towards terminal 2, terminal 2 will have less resistance than terminal 1. What is the concept involved here?
The terminals do not have resistance. The concept involved here is that if the wiper is moved up the resistance between "1" and the wiper decreases, while the resistance between the wiper and "2" decreases. When the wiper is all the way up, the resistance between "1" and the wiper is zero while the resistance between the wiper and "2" has its maximum value.

Going by the same argument, in my second attachment(Voltage Divider1.png), the wiper is moved down, the dark black point in the diagram should have less resistance and more current, so more voltage drop. Am i interpreted the second diagram correctly?
Again, points don't have resistance. The resistance is between the wiper and the dark black point at the bottom. As the wiper is moved down, the resistance between the wiper and the dark point at the bottom decreases as I just said. Now the current provided by the battery stays same because the resistance between the top dark point and the bottom dark point does not change if you move the wiper. Since V = IR, when R decreases while I stays the same, V has to decrease.
 
kuruman said:
The terminals do not have resistance. The concept involved here is that if the wiper is moved up the resistance between "1" and the wiper decreases, while the resistance between the wiper and "2" decreases. When the wiper is all the way up, the resistance between "1" and the wiper is zero while the resistance between the wiper and "2" has its maximum value.
Sir, but why the resistance between "1" and the wiper decreases, if the wiper is moved up?
 
logearav said:
Sir, but why the resistance between "1" and the wiper decreases, if the wiper is moved up?

The potentiometer consists of a strip of resistive material (with a resistance of so many Ohms per meter), with a sliding wiper contact that can move along that strip. Contacts are attached to the two ends of the strip and the wiper forms a third contact. When the position of the wiper changes, the distances between the point of contact of the wiper and the ends of the strip changes. The resistance between two points of contact on the strip depends upon the distance between them. Smaller distance --> less resistance. Larger distance --> larger resistance.

attachment.php?attachmentid=38892&stc=1&d=1316119981.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    4.6 KB · Views: 551
Thanks Mr. Kurumman and Mr. Gneill for your replies.
Mr. Gneill, do the equation R [itex]\alpha[/itex] l/A, hold good in this situation?
 
logearav said:
Mr. Gneill, do the equation R [itex]\alpha[/itex] l/A, hold good in this situation?

If l is the length and A the cross sectional area, then yes, it holds in general. But in this particular case the resistivity constant is defined so that the cross sectional area is taken into account and only the length is a variable. [itex]R \propto L[/itex].
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K