camilus
- 146
- 0
The discussion centers on the relationship between Euler's product formula and the Riemann Zeta function, specifically the transition from the product representation to the series representation involving prime numbers. The key equality discussed is ∏_{p-prime} 1/(1+p^-3) = Ʃ(-1)^{ord(k)}/k^3, highlighting the significance of the ord_p(k) function in determining the signs of terms in the series. Participants clarify the geometric series expansion and the implications of negative signs in the context of prime products and their contributions to the Zeta function.
ord_p(k) notationord_p(k) in number theoryMathematicians, number theorists, and students studying analytic number theory who seek to deepen their understanding of the connections between prime numbers, Euler's formula, and the Riemann Zeta function.
Should \prod_\mathbb{P} \left( \sum_{\mathbb{Z} \ge 0} p^{-s n} \right) ^{-1} have that ^(-1) after it? Or am I missing something..? Are you rewriting 1/(1-p^-s) using geometric series?lurflurf said:We know
$$\prod_\mathbb{P} (1-p^{-s})^{-1}=\prod_\mathbb{P} \left( \sum_{\mathbb{Z} \ge 0} p^{-s n} \right) ^{-1} = \sum_{\mathbb{Z}>0} n^{-s}$$
with the minus sign it is a little more complicated
$$\prod_\mathbb{P} (1+p^{-s})^{-1}=\prod_\mathbb{P} \left( \sum_{\mathbb{Z} \ge 0} (-p)^{-s n} \right) ^{-1} = \sum_{\mathbb{Z}>0} (-1)^{\sum ord_p(k)}n^{-s}$$
Where the ord_p(k) makes sure we get the right sign (it counts the minuses), clearly
$$\left( \prod_\mathbb{P} (1-p^{-s})^{-1} \right) \left( \prod_\mathbb{P} (1+p^{-s})^{-1} \right) =\zeta(2n)$$
but instead of using that your link makes a simple estimate