What is the connection between Euler's formula and the Zeta function?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter camilus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between Euler's product formula and the Riemann Zeta function, specifically the transition from the product representation to the series representation involving prime numbers. The key equality discussed is ∏_{p-prime} 1/(1+p^-3) = Ʃ(-1)^{ord(k)}/k^3, highlighting the significance of the ord_p(k) function in determining the signs of terms in the series. Participants clarify the geometric series expansion and the implications of negative signs in the context of prime products and their contributions to the Zeta function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler's product formula
  • Familiarity with the Riemann Zeta function
  • Knowledge of prime factorization and ord_p(k) notation
  • Basic concepts of geometric series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler product formula for the Riemann Zeta function
  • Explore the implications of ord_p(k) in number theory
  • Learn about the convergence properties of series involving prime numbers
  • Investigate the relationship between the Zeta function and Dirichlet series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students studying analytic number theory who seek to deepen their understanding of the connections between prime numbers, Euler's formula, and the Riemann Zeta function.

camilus
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I'm trying to understand the step where they wrote

1/2 ∏1/(1+p^-3) =1/2 Ʃ(-1)^ord(k)/k^3

How can I see this? I know the Euler product formula, but it has a negative sign before the p^-3, where here we have a + sign.

Thanks for the help.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 502
Physics news on Phys.org
The step going from the second to last line, to the last line.
 
I need help understanding this equality:

\prod_{p-prime} \frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{p^3}}= \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{\sum_p ord_p(k)}}{k^3}


Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
We know
$$\prod_\mathbb{P} (1-p^{-s})^{-1}=\prod_\mathbb{P} \left( \sum_{\mathbb{Z} \ge 0} p^{-s n} \right) ^{-1} = \sum_{\mathbb{Z}>0} n^{-s}$$

with the minus sign it is a little more complicated

$$\prod_\mathbb{P} (1+p^{-s})^{-1}=\prod_\mathbb{P} \left( \sum_{\mathbb{Z} \ge 0} (-p)^{-s n} \right) ^{-1} = \sum_{\mathbb{Z}>0} (-1)^{\sum ord_p(k)}n^{-s}$$

Where the ord_p(k) makes sure we get the right sign (it counts the minuses), clearly

$$\left( \prod_\mathbb{P} (1-p^{-s})^{-1} \right) \left( \prod_\mathbb{P} (1+p^{-s})^{-1} \right) =\zeta(2n)$$

but instead of using that your link makes a simple estimate
 
lurflurf said:
We know
$$\prod_\mathbb{P} (1-p^{-s})^{-1}=\prod_\mathbb{P} \left( \sum_{\mathbb{Z} \ge 0} p^{-s n} \right) ^{-1} = \sum_{\mathbb{Z}>0} n^{-s}$$

with the minus sign it is a little more complicated

$$\prod_\mathbb{P} (1+p^{-s})^{-1}=\prod_\mathbb{P} \left( \sum_{\mathbb{Z} \ge 0} (-p)^{-s n} \right) ^{-1} = \sum_{\mathbb{Z}>0} (-1)^{\sum ord_p(k)}n^{-s}$$

Where the ord_p(k) makes sure we get the right sign (it counts the minuses), clearly

$$\left( \prod_\mathbb{P} (1-p^{-s})^{-1} \right) \left( \prod_\mathbb{P} (1+p^{-s})^{-1} \right) =\zeta(2n)$$

but instead of using that your link makes a simple estimate
Should \prod_\mathbb{P} \left( \sum_{\mathbb{Z} \ge 0} p^{-s n} \right) ^{-1} have that ^(-1) after it? Or am I missing something..? Are you rewriting 1/(1-p^-s) using geometric series?

Anyways, thanks that was very helpful, I'm looking into the proofs of the product formula via this route.
 
Yes that is a geometric series expansion.
 
What about the negative one?
 
$$\prod_\mathbb{P} (1+p^{-s})^{-1}=
\prod_\mathbb{P} (1-(-p^{-s}))^{-1}= \\
\prod_\mathbb{P} \left( 1-p^{-s}+p^{-2s}-p^{-3s}+...+(-1)^k p^{-ks}+... \right) ^{-1} = \sum_{\mathbb{Z}>0} a_n n^{-s}=\frac{\zeta(2n)}{\zeta(n)}$$
a_n being in{-1,1}
In the sum each term is positive or negative and we can determine which using
ord_p(k)
it is a bit tedious to compute, which is why the link estimates
here is the wikipedia
[PLAIN]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki... one way (fundamental theorem of arithmetic).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
659