What is the connection between F Theory and M Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    M theory Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between F Theory and M Theory, specifically the implications of F Theory's proposed two time dimensions within a 12-dimensional framework. Participants debate the logical consistency of two time dimensions, with some suggesting it could allow for simultaneous existence of past and future, potentially enabling time travel without violating thermodynamic laws. The conversation highlights the complexities of entropy and its directional nature, ultimately questioning the feasibility of two time dimensions in understanding the universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of M Theory and its implications in string theory.
  • Familiarity with the concept of entropy and the laws of thermodynamics.
  • Basic knowledge of dimensional theories in physics, particularly string theory.
  • Awareness of philosophical implications of time travel and temporal dimensions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the fundamentals of F Theory and its mathematical framework.
  • Explore the implications of multiple time dimensions in theoretical physics.
  • Study the relationship between entropy and thermodynamics in closed systems.
  • Investigate philosophical perspectives on time travel and its paradoxes.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of advanced physics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of time and dimensional theories.

  • #31
Originally posted by MajinVegeta
Mentat, assume the universe is unbalanced=disorderly. If it is unbalanced, then it could be both at onece. That's what makes it disorderly.

Are you saying that, if it is disorderly, then it can be orderly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I assume that by "two time dimensions" they mean two timelike dimensions, in the sense that the radial dimension of a black hole is timelike (it forces you to move forward, never backward.) I doubt it's much of anything to worry about and more than likely has nothing to do with entropy.
 
  • #33
Originally posted by Mentat
Are you saying that, if it is disorderly, then it can be orderly?

No, not orderly as in completely orderly. What I mean is 'portions' could be orderly, and others wouldn't be orderly. And that's what makes it disorderly, disproportional. BUT, don't take what I'm saying as factual; I'm speculating at the top of my head.
 
  • #34
Originally posted by MajinVegeta
No, not orderly as in completely orderly. What I mean is 'portions' could be orderly, and others wouldn't be orderly. And that's what makes it disorderly, disproportional. BUT, don't take what I'm saying as factual; I'm speculating at the top of my head.

Majin, whether it's altogether disorderly or orderderly is not really important. What I'm saying is that if it is getting more disorderly then it is getting less and less orderly, isn't that right?
 
  • #35
Precisely!

But what does 'disorder' imply about the universe? Chaos?
 
  • #36
Originally posted by MajinVegeta
Precisely!

Then the idea of entropy's "increasing in more than one direction" is nonsensical, is it not?
 
  • #37
I guess.
 
  • #38
Originally posted by MajinVegeta
I guess.

Alas, there are quite a few people who hold to the idea of two time dimensions, and so there may be some good reasoning behind it. Don't just take my reasoning, learn as much as you can about them (if your interested) and make your own conclusion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K