What is the construction for taking inverse images of subschemes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eof
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images Inverse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the construction of inverse images of subschemes in the context of scheme morphisms. Specifically, it examines the morphism f: X → Y and the implications of taking the inverse image of an open subscheme U of Y, resulting in f^{-1}U as an open subset of X. The structure sheaf O_U of U can be extended to Y, allowing for the definition of f^*O_U. However, the challenge remains in establishing a construction for closed subschemes, as the inverse image must also be an open subscheme of X, highlighting the necessity of considering both the morphism and the corresponding ring homomorphism together.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scheme theory and morphisms in algebraic geometry
  • Familiarity with structure sheaves and their properties
  • Knowledge of open and closed subschemes
  • Basic concepts of category theory as applied to schemes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of inverse images in the context of algebraic geometry
  • Study the relationship between morphisms and ring homomorphisms in schemes
  • Explore examples of open and closed subschemes in various schemes
  • Investigate existing constructions for inverse images of closed subschemes
USEFUL FOR

Algebraic geometers, researchers in scheme theory, and graduate students studying advanced concepts in algebraic geometry will benefit from this discussion.

eof
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hi,

As is the case with functions, we can always define the inverse image of a subset. In the case of schemes I was wondering if there is something that could be taken as the inverse image of a subscheme?

Example:

Let f:X->Y be a scheme morphism. Then if U is an open subscheme of Y, we have that f^{-1}U is an open subset of X. The structure sheaf O_U of U can be taken to be a O_Y-module provided that we extend it to the space Y by

V -> O_U(V \cap U)

so this way we could define f^*O_U. For this to make any sense, we would need to have f^*O_U(V)=O_X(V) for any open V\subset X.

Thus the definition doesn't really give us an inverse image of a scheme, because it would have to an open subscheme of X. So is there any way of providing the kind of construction I'm looking at? I don't see any smart way of doing this for closed subschemes either. Does anybody know if there's a construction to take inverse images of subschemes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As schemes build a category, we also have pre-images of scheme morphisms. So the key lies in the proof that schemes build a category. This means especially that the function ##f## and the corresponding ring homomorphism must be considered together. You cannot separate the two, as they build the morphisms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K