What is the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in higher dimensions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ismaili
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Spinors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in higher dimensions, particularly within the context of Clifford algebra. Participants explore introductory resources, mathematical formulations, and specific questions related to the properties and representations of these matrices in various dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks introductory articles on gamma matrices and spinors, expressing difficulty with existing literature, specifically Polchinski's string theory book.
  • Another participant suggests "A menu of supergravities" by Van Proeyen as a potentially helpful resource.
  • A participant presents a detailed mathematical framework for constructing gamma matrices in even dimensions, including specific formulations for d = 2 and d = 6.
  • There is a question raised about the use of the matrix \(\sigma^3\) in the construction of gamma matrices for d = 6, with the participant initially expecting the identity matrix instead.
  • A later reply proposes that the use of \(\sigma^3\) is necessary to maintain the correct anti-commutation relations when extending the dimensions.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the introduction of conjugation and charge conjugation matrices after discussing gamma matrices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the simplest introductory resources for understanding gamma matrices and spinors. There are differing views on the necessity of using \(\sigma^3\) in the construction of gamma matrices, with some participants providing reasoning while others remain uncertain.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the mathematical concepts involved, indicating potential gaps in foundational knowledge or assumptions about prior understanding. The discussion includes unresolved questions about specific mathematical steps and the implications of using different matrices in the construction process.

ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Dear guys,

I want to understand the spinors in various dimensions and Clifford algebra. I tried to read the appendix B of Polchinski's volume II of his string theory book. But it's hard for me to follow and I stuck in the very beginning. I will try to figure out the outline and post my questions later.

For now, I want to ask for very simple, introductory articles for the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in various dimensions. (Is the appendix B of Polchinski the simplest article among all?:blushing:)

Thanks for your help!

Ismaili
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe "A menu of supergravities" of Van Proeyen can help you. I found it quite understandable.
 
haushofer said:
Maybe "A menu of supergravities" of Van Proeyen can help you. I found it quite understandable.
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?

---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.

In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}<br />
In the even dimension, d = 2k+2, one can group the \gamma^\mu into k+1 sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
<br /> \gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br /> \quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})<br />
where a=1,2,\cdots, k.
One then found that,
<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0<br />
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of k species of fermions. In particular, from
(\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0
one sees there exist a vacuum |\xi\rangle annihilated by all \gamma^{a-}.
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
<br /> (\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle<br />
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of k species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is 2^{k+1}.

In d = 2, one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ -1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2
\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ 1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1

One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by d \rightarrow d+2. But now comes my question, for d = 6
<br /> \gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \quad\quad\quad\vdots<br />
<br /> \gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1<br />
<br /> \gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2<br />
where I is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that, why do we use \textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!

Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!
 
ismaili said:
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?

---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.

In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}<br />
In the even dimension, d = 2k+2, one can group the \gamma^\mu into k+1 sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
<br /> \gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br /> \quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})<br />
where a=1,2,\cdots, k.
One then found that,
<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0<br />
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of k species of fermions. In particular, from
(\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0
one sees there exist a vacuum |\xi\rangle annihilated by all \gamma^{a-}.
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
<br /> (\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle<br />
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of k species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is 2^{k+1}.

In d = 2, one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ -1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2
\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ 1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1

One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by d \rightarrow d+2. But now comes my question, for d = 6
<br /> \gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \quad\quad\quad\vdots<br />
<br /> \gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1<br />
<br /> \gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2<br />
where I is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that, why do we use \textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!

Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!

I think I know the answer to the use of \sigma^3.
The gamma matrices in d = 2 invole only \sigma^1, \sigma^2.
When we add the spacetime dimension by 2,
in order to get the correct anti-commutation relations,
we have to tensor product the original gamma matrices by \sigma^3.

-----

After figuring out the construction of higher dimensional gamma matrices,
I was confused by the suddenly born conjugation matrix B and charge conjugation matrix C
...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K