What is the Correct Linearization of a Function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the linearization of a function, specifically focusing on the correct formulation and evaluation of the linearization at a given point. The subject area includes calculus, particularly the concepts of derivatives and linear approximations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of linearization and its application at the point x = e. There are attempts to clarify the correct form of the linearization and the evaluation of function values and derivatives at that point. Questions arise regarding the discrepancy between different linearization expressions and their evaluations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications on the linearization process. Some participants suggest alternative forms of the linearization and question the assumptions made in the original poster's approach. There is a recognition of the importance of adhering to the formal definition of linearization.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion stemming from differing evaluations of the function and its derivative at the point of interest. There is an acknowledgment of the need to align closely with the formal definitions to avoid intuitive missteps.

Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://i3.minus.com/jbt2vueBfwXvWD.jpg

Homework Equations



Linearization: f(x) + f'(x)(dx)

The Attempt at a Solution



The derivative of g(x) using the chain rule is (2lnx)/x. x = e, so that simplifies to 2/e.

Linearization:

(2/e)x + 1, where 1 is f(e).

Why is the answer (2/e)x - 1 instead? I thought f(e) is 1, not negative 1?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Qube! :smile:

That works fine for x = 0 … not so much for x = e ! :wink:

(2/e)x + 1 at x = e is 3

(2/e)x - 1 at x = e is 1 …

which do you prefer? o:)

(2/e)(x - e) + 1 would be ok :smile:
 
Qube said:
Linearization: f(x) + f'(x)(dx)

I was told that the linearization is defined this way:
L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a),
where f is differentiable at a.
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Qube! :smile:

That works fine for x = 0 … not so much for x = e ! :wink:

(2/e)x + 1 at x = e is 3

(2/e)x - 1 at x = e is 1 …

which do you prefer? o:)

(2/e)(x - e) + 1 would be ok :smile:

Yes, I see how working backwards helps, but how can I work to the solution instead of vice versa?
 
eumyang said:
I was told that the linearization is defined this way:
L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a),
where f is differentiable at a.

Yes, and I seem to get 1 + (2/e)x
 
eumyang said:
L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a)

f(a) = 1, f'(a) = 2/e, (x - a) = (x - e)

total: 1 + 2/e (x - e) = (2/e)x - 1 :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Show us what you did.

L(x) = g(x) + g'(a)(x - a)

For L(e), what do you get? I get (2/e)x - 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ohh I see. Alright.

a = e

f(e) = 1

f'(e) = 2/e

1 + (2/e)(x-e) = 1 + (2/e)x - 2 and the 1 - 2 results in the -1. Alright. I think my problem was not sticking closely enough with the definition and instead going with a gut feel / intuition about how linearization works.
 
Qube said:
… and instead going with a gut feel / intuition about how linearization works.

the gut is not linear! :wink:
250px-Stomach_colon_rectum_diagram.svg.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K