What is the Correct Linearization of a Function?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The correct linearization of the function g(x) at the point x = e is L(x) = (2/e)(x - e) + 1, which simplifies to (2/e)x - 1. The derivative g'(x) is calculated using the chain rule, yielding g'(e) = 2/e. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the value of f(e), which is indeed 1, leading to the correct linearization formula being applied. Understanding the definition of linearization is crucial for accurately solving such problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically derivatives and linearization.
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in differentiation.
  • Knowledge of evaluating functions at specific points.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving linear functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and applications of linearization in calculus.
  • Practice problems involving the chain rule for derivatives.
  • Explore the concept of differentiability and its implications for linearization.
  • Learn how to derive linear approximations for various functions at different points.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on derivatives and linear approximations, as well as educators looking for examples of common misunderstandings in linearization techniques.

Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://i3.minus.com/jbt2vueBfwXvWD.jpg

Homework Equations



Linearization: f(x) + f'(x)(dx)

The Attempt at a Solution



The derivative of g(x) using the chain rule is (2lnx)/x. x = e, so that simplifies to 2/e.

Linearization:

(2/e)x + 1, where 1 is f(e).

Why is the answer (2/e)x - 1 instead? I thought f(e) is 1, not negative 1?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Qube! :smile:

That works fine for x = 0 … not so much for x = e ! :wink:

(2/e)x + 1 at x = e is 3

(2/e)x - 1 at x = e is 1 …

which do you prefer? o:)

(2/e)(x - e) + 1 would be ok :smile:
 
Qube said:
Linearization: f(x) + f'(x)(dx)

I was told that the linearization is defined this way:
L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a),
where f is differentiable at a.
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Qube! :smile:

That works fine for x = 0 … not so much for x = e ! :wink:

(2/e)x + 1 at x = e is 3

(2/e)x - 1 at x = e is 1 …

which do you prefer? o:)

(2/e)(x - e) + 1 would be ok :smile:

Yes, I see how working backwards helps, but how can I work to the solution instead of vice versa?
 
eumyang said:
I was told that the linearization is defined this way:
L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a),
where f is differentiable at a.

Yes, and I seem to get 1 + (2/e)x
 
eumyang said:
L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a)

f(a) = 1, f'(a) = 2/e, (x - a) = (x - e)

total: 1 + 2/e (x - e) = (2/e)x - 1 :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Show us what you did.

L(x) = g(x) + g'(a)(x - a)

For L(e), what do you get? I get (2/e)x - 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ohh I see. Alright.

a = e

f(e) = 1

f'(e) = 2/e

1 + (2/e)(x-e) = 1 + (2/e)x - 2 and the 1 - 2 results in the -1. Alright. I think my problem was not sticking closely enough with the definition and instead going with a gut feel / intuition about how linearization works.
 
Qube said:
… and instead going with a gut feel / intuition about how linearization works.

the gut is not linear! :wink:
250px-Stomach_colon_rectum_diagram.svg.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K