What Is the Correct Non-Dimensional Time Scaling in CFD for 2D Channel Flow?

Click For Summary
In simulating 2D channel flow of two viscous fluids using CFD software, the user is exploring non-dimensional time scaling, specifically questioning if τ = √(ρl³/σ) is appropriate. They are considering inviscid flow with g=0 and a low viscosity, suggesting that their scaling could effectively lead to the Weber number in the dimensionless equations. However, they note a challenge with incorporating velocity, as it is derived solely from surface tension in this context. The discussion emphasizes that the correct non-dimensional scaling is highly dependent on the specific application. Overall, the user seeks clarification on their approach and any additional insights regarding the Weber number's velocity component.
member 428835
Hi PF!

I'm running a CFD software that non-dimensionalizes the NS equations. The problem I'm simulating is a 2D channel flow: relaxation oscillations of an interface between two viscous fluids, shown here. I'm trying to see what they are non-dimensionalizing time with, which is evidently just ##\tau## shown here.

Thinking about my problem, quantities that involve time are ##g,\mu,\sigma##. However, I'm setting ##g=0## and trying assume inviscid flow so ##\mu \ll 1##. This makes me think for my problem ##\tau = \sqrt{\rho l^3 / \sigma}##. Do you agree?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The proper dimensionless scaling depends on application. I can't honestly tell you what your software package uses, but the scaling you provide does look like a good building block for producing the Weber number in your final dimensionless equation, which would be appropriate here.
 
boneh3ad said:
The proper dimensionless scaling depends on application. I can't honestly tell you what your software package uses, but the scaling you provide does look like a good building block for producing the Weber number in your final dimensionless equation, which would be appropriate here.
Not sure why I missed this until now? The issue with the Weber number is the velocity, which I compute with the surface tension (it's the only temporal component since we look at an inviscid fluid). Any other ideas?

Apologies for the late reply.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K