MHB What is the correct slant asymptote for this function and why is it significant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter m3dicat3d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asymptote
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the concept of slant asymptotes in relation to the function given. It emphasizes that while the function approaches the slant asymptote, it never actually crosses it due to the presence of a non-zero remainder in the long division. The calculation shows that the function behaves like -3x + 2 as it approaches infinity, confirming that this line is indeed the slant asymptote. The confusion around the graphical representation of asymptotes is addressed, highlighting the importance of understanding the behavior of the function at extreme values. Overall, the significance of the slant asymptote lies in its role in describing the end behavior of the function.
m3dicat3d
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
View attachment 819Why is the slant asymptote pictured here correct for this function? I was under the impression an asymptote was never crossed by the function. I get that the dividend gives the equation for the asymptote for a non zero remainder, but seeing this graphically is a bit confusing. Thanks! (EDIT: NVM, I just answered my own question:p) Thanks anyways though!
 

Attachments

  • slant asymtope.JPG
    slant asymtope.JPG
    16.5 KB · Views: 111
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you long divide, you'll see that [math]\displaystyle \frac{-6x^3 + 4x^2 - 1}{2x^2 + 1} \equiv -3x + 2 + \frac{x}{2x^2 + 1} = -3x + 2 + \frac{1}{2x + \frac{1}{x}} [/math].

You can see that the denominator easily overpowers the numerator, and so gets closer to 0, which means the entire function eventually works like [math]\displaystyle -3x + 2[/math]. However, since there is always that tiny bit added, it never actually will be [math]\displaystyle -3x + 2[/math], and so [math]\displaystyle y = -3x + 2[/math] must be an asymptote :)
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 178 ·
6
Replies
178
Views
27K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K