What is the correct wavelength of the light provided by the laser?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the correct wavelength of light emitted by a laser, using a double-slit interference setup. Participants are analyzing the geometry of the setup, including distances from slits to screen and the spacing between slits.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different interpretations of the equations used for calculating wavelength, questioning the significance of the order of fringes and the distances involved. There are attempts to clarify whether the calculations should consider bright to bright fringes or bright to dark fringes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of fringe orders and the application of relevant equations, but no consensus has been reached on the correct wavelength calculation.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions of fringe orders and the implications of using different equations based on those definitions. Participants are also referencing a diagram to aid their understanding, but the exact setup details remain somewhat ambiguous.

vanceEE
Messages
109
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In Fig. 6.1 the distance from the two slits to the screen is 1.8 m. The distance CP is
2.3 mm and the distance between the slits is 0.25 mm.
Calculate the wavelength of the light provided by the laser.

Homework Equations


$$asinθ = nλ$$
$$w = \frac{λD}{a}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$θ = tan^{-1}(\frac{2.3×10^{-3}}{1.8}) = 0.0732°$$
Since P is first order, n = 1.
$$ λ = (0.25×10^-3)(sin(0.0732°)) = 319.4 nm $$

According to the mark scheme it is incorrect:
$$ λ = ax / D $$
$$ = \frac{2 × 2.3 × 10^{–3} × 0.25 ×10^{–3}}{1.8} $$
$$ = 639 nm $$Why must I multiply my wavelength by two?
 

Attachments

  • Double Slit.jpg
    Double Slit.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 554
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's because that equation is for B to C (according to your diagram) not C to P. Or, in other words, bright fringe to bright fringe. Since, the dark fringe is halfway between the bright fringes, you get half the result.
 
rpthomps said:
It's because that equation is for B to C (according to your diagram) not C to P. Or, in other words, bright fringe to bright fringe. Since, the dark fringe is halfway between the bright fringes, you get half the result.

$$ θ = tan^{-1}(\frac{|CB|}{1.8}) = tan^{-1}(\frac{4.6*10^{-3}}{1.8}) = 0.1464° $$
B is 2nd order, hence n = 2.
$$(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°) = 2λ$$
$$λ = \frac{(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°)}{2} = 319.4 nm$$

Please explain; I am still getting the same wavelength.
 
Are the bright fringe to bright fringe considered to be 1st order? For example, would the middle-fringe (green) be zero and the first two greens on the top and bottom of the middle fringe be considered first order?
http://h2physics.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/young2a.jpg

If so, then the equation would in fact be:
$$(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°) = λ$$
= 639 nm
Right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vanceEE said:
$$ θ = tan^{-1}(\frac{|CB|}{1.8}) = tan^{-1}(\frac{4.6*10^{-3}}{1.8}) = 0.1464° $$
B is 2nd order, hence n = 2.
$$(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°) = 2λ$$
$$λ = \frac{(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°)}{2} = 319.4 nm$$

Please explain; I am still getting the same wavelength.

It looks first order to me(1st bright fringe to the center). I would use the equation:

$$λ=\frac{mx_md}{L}$$ where

x_m is the distance from the center to the first bright fringe
m is the order (in this case 1)
This gives you your answer.
 
vanceEE said:
Are the bright fringe to bright fringe considered to be 1st order? For example, would the middle-fringe (green) be zero and the first two greens on the top and bottom of the middle fringe be considered first order?

If so, then the equation would in fact be:
$$(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°) = λ$$
= 639 nm
Right?

Yes. You were thinking bright fringe to dark fringe is one order but in fact it is bright to bright. This is why you are getting half of what you should have got.
 
rpthomps said:
Yes. You were thinking bright fringe to dark fringe is one order but in fact it is bright to bright. This is why you are getting half of what you should have got.

Ok, thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K