What is the correct way to find the argument of a complex number?

Click For Summary
To find the argument of the complex number z = 1 - i, the angle with the positive real axis is calculated as arctan(1/1) = pi/4. Since this point is in the fourth quadrant, the argument can be expressed as 2*pi - pi/4. However, MATLAB provides the argument as -pi/4, which is a valid representation but not the principal argument. The principal argument lies between 0 and 2pi, making it 7*pi/4 for this complex number. Understanding the distinction between different representations of the argument is crucial for accurate calculations.
sara_87
Messages
748
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a complex number
z=1-i

I want to find the argument of this complex number

Homework Equations



The angle it makes with the positive real axis is arctan(1/1)=pi/4

The Attempt at a Solution



This point lies in the fourth quadrant of the argand diagram.

Arg(z)= angle the z makes anticlockwise with the positive real axis = 2*pi - pi/4

is 2*pi-pi/4 the correct answer?

In matlab, the argument of this number is -pi/4 so I don't understand, doesn't the argument have to always be measured anticlockwise from the positive real axis?

Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sara_87 said:

Homework Statement



I have a complex number
z=1-i

I want to find the argument of this complex number

Homework Equations



The angle it makes with the positive real axis is arctan(1/1)=pi/4

The Attempt at a Solution



This point lies in the fourth quadrant of the argand diagram.

Arg(z)= angle the z makes anticlockwise with the positive real axis = 2*pi - pi/4

is 2*pi-pi/4 the correct answer?

In matlab, the argument of this number is -pi/4 so I don't understand, doesn't the argument have to always be measured anticlockwise from the positive real axis?
That might be so for positive angles, but negative angles are measured in the clockwise direction. I can't imagine that MATLAB would require all angles to be positive.

The angles 7\pi/4 and -\pi/4 are of course different, but they have the same reference point.
sara_87 said:
Thank you in advance
 
You can freely add multiples of 2pi to the arument of a complex number without changing its value. For different multiples of 2pi, you obtain different representations of the same argument. After all, the radian mesure is periodic in 2pi. However, there exists the notion of the principal argument (or the principal value of the argument) of a complex number. Of all the possible representations of the argument, this is the one lying between 0 and 2pi.

Therefore -pi/4 is a valid representation of arg(1-i), but it is not the principal argument. The principal argument is 7pi/4, as you stated.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
927
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K