MHB What is the Cost of One Jump Ring in a $8 Pack of 1000?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enoonmai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump Ring
Enoonmai
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If I get a pack of 1,000 jump rings (for jewelry), and the bag costs me $8, how much is EACH jump ring? is it 8 divided by 1,000, which is .008 cents per ring, or is this .008 dollars, and I move the decimal spaces two to the left to get cents? I m a bit confused... Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would write:

$$\frac{\$8}{1000 \text{ jump rings}}\cdot\frac{100\text{ cents}}{\$1}=\frac{4}{5}\,\frac{\text{cents}}{\text{jump ring}}$$
 
MarkFL said:
I would write:

$$\frac{\$8}{1000 \text{ jump rings}}\cdot\frac{100\text{ cents}}{\$1}=\frac{4}{5}\,\frac{\text{cents}}{\text{jump ring}}$$

Thank you very much! So the .008 was just .008 "dollars" earlier? $8/1000 = 0.008 Dollars?

Is that the same as saying "one tenth of 8 cents per ring" ?
 
Enoonmai said:
Thank you very much! So the .008 was just .008 "dollars" earlier? $8/1000 = 0.008 Dollars?

Is that the same as saying "one tenth of 8 cents per ring" ?

Yes, and another way to look at it is "4 cents for every 5 jump rings."
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top