What is the defining property of a subgroup in group G with elements A^g?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a subgroup defined by the conjugation of elements in a group G. The original poster is tasked with demonstrating that the set Ag, formed by conjugating a subgroup A by an element g in G, is itself a subgroup of G.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the one-step subgroup test and the necessary properties that need to be verified for Ag to be a subgroup. Questions arise about identifying the defining property of Ag and whether the identity element is included.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaged in clarifying the requirements for proving that Ag is a subgroup. There is an ongoing exploration of the necessary conditions, including the identity element and closure under the group operation. Some participants are questioning assumptions and providing insights into the properties of conjugation.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions and properties of group elements under conjugation, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the implications of their assumptions and the correct application of group theory concepts.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Let G be a group and let [tex]A \leq G[/tex] be a subgroup. If [tex]g \in G[/tex], then [tex]A^g \subseteq G[/tex] is defined as

[tex]A^g = \{ a^g | a \in A \}[/tex] where [tex]a^g = g^{-1}ag \in G[/tex]

Show that Ag is a subgroup of G.

The Attempt at a Solution



I will use the one step subgroup test. First I have to identify the property that distinguishes the elements of Ag (a defining condition). I don't see what's the binary operation so I can't tell what this property is... :confused:

If I knew this property, I would prove that the identity has this property, so that Ag is nonempty. Then I'd use the assumption that a and b have that property to show that ab-1 has this property. Could anyone help me out to see what the property of this group is?

P.S. I think the identity for this group is "1", right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


isn't it given by: [itex]a^g = g^{-1}ag \in G[/itex]?

then from memory you need to show:
- the identity is part of the subgroup
- its closed under multiplication, ie if u & v are both in, then so is uv
- the inverse of any element is also part of subgroup

these whould all follow pretty straight forwarly from the group definition, remembering that A is a subgroup itself
 


lanedance said:
isn't it given by: [itex]a^g = g^{-1}ag \in G[/itex]?

then from memory you need to show:
- the identity is part of the subgroup
- its closed under multiplication, ie if u & v are both in, then so is uv
- the inverse of any element is also part of subgroup

these whould all follow pretty straight forwarly from the group definition, remembering that A is a subgroup itself

I want to use the "one step subgroup test". For this test I don't have to check closure. I only need to check that ab-1 is in the group whenever a and b are in the group.

To show that identity is in the group is it sufficient to show that g-11g=1? This verifies that Ag in nonempty.

Suppose a=g-1ag and b=g-1bg are elements in Ag who satisfy the property.

b-1 = gbg-1

ab-1 = g-1ag . gbg-1

What can I do next? :rolleyes:
 


roam said:
I want to use the "one step subgroup test". For this test I don't have to check closure. I only need to check that ab-1 is in the group whenever a and b are in the group.

To show that identity is in the group is it sufficient to show that g-11g=1? This verifies that Ag in nonempty.

Suppose a=g-1ag and b=g-1bg are elements in Ag who satisfy the property.

b-1 = gbg-1
No, this is wrong. You can show that [itex](gbg^{-1})^{-1}= gb^{-1}g^{-1}[/itex] directly from the definition of "inverse".


ab-1 = g-1ag . gbg-1

What can I do next? :rolleyes:
 


I made some mistakes, so I will start over.

We write two elements of Ag in the correct form (correct form here being [tex]a^g = g^{-1}ag[/tex]):

ag and bg

Then I must show that [tex]a^g(b^g)^{-1}[/tex] also has the correct form; that is it can be written as [tex]g^{-1}(ab^{-1})g[/tex]. I start here:

[tex]a^{g}(b^{g})^{-1} = (g^{-1}ag)(gb^{-1}g^{-1})[/tex]

But how does one simplify [tex](g^{-1}ag)(gb^{-1}g^{-1})[/tex] to get [tex]g^{-1}(ab^{-1})g[/tex]? This is where I'm stuck...
 


why do you assume [itex](b^{g})^{-1} = (gb^{-1}g^{-1})[/itex] ?
 


cos its not... try multiplying with [itex]b^{g}[/itex]
 


lanedance said:
why do you assume [itex](b^{g})^{-1} = (gb^{-1}g^{-1})[/itex] ?

Because [tex]b^g = g^{-1} b g[/tex]

therefore [tex](b^g)^{-1}= (g^{-1} b g)^{-1} = g b^{-1} g^{-1}[/tex]

cos its not... try multiplying with [tex]b^{g}[/tex]

could you show me? because I don't understand what you mean here...
 


just remember you need to switch orders when you invert (ab)-1 = b-1 a-1.
 
  • #10


qbert said:
just remember you need to switch orders when you invert (ab)-1 = b-1 a-1.

or just start with b^g and just see what you would have to multiply it by to get the identity
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K