What is the Definition of Whole Numbers in Mathematics?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nDever
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Set
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of whole numbers in mathematics, exploring the inconsistencies in their usage across different educational contexts and literature. Participants examine whether there is a universally accepted definition and the implications of varying definitions on mathematical terminology.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that their understanding of whole numbers has varied, initially being taught that they include all natural numbers and zero, then later being told they encompass all integers.
  • Another participant asserts that there is no universally accepted definition of whole numbers, indicating that different authors use the term to mean different things.
  • Some participants suggest that mathematicians prefer terms like "integers," "non-negative integers," and "positive integers" to avoid ambiguity associated with the term "whole numbers."
  • It is mentioned that the term "natural number" also lacks consistency, with some definitions including zero and others not.
  • One participant claims that terms such as "whole," "natural," and "counting" do appear in textbooks, but their definitions can vary significantly.
  • A later reply emphasizes that elements of the set of integers, denoted as \mathbb{Z}, are more accurately referred to as 'integer' numbers rather than 'whole' numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there is no single, universally accepted definition of whole numbers, and multiple competing views regarding their definition remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of definitions in mathematical terminology, particularly the dependence on context and the variability in educational resources.

nDever
Messages
76
Reaction score
1
This question may be a bit elementary and trivial but I am curious.

Throughout my Algebra classes, the definition of whole numbers were inconsistent. First, I was taught that the whole numbers were a subset of real numbers including all natural numbers and zero (non-negative integers), then, I was told that whole numbers included all integers (...-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3...).

Is there a universally accepted definition of the set of whole numbers?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
no, there is not. different authors use the term "whole numbers" to mean different things, and because of this, mathematicians usually don't use this term, preferring:

integers
non-negative integers
positive integers

so as to avoid ambiguity.

even the term "natural number" is not consistently used, as some people include 0, but others do not.
 
Deveno said:
no, there is not. different authors use the term "whole numbers" to mean different things, and because of this, mathematicians usually don't use this term, preferring:

integers
non-negative integers
positive integers

so as to avoid ambiguity.

even the term "natural number" is not consistently used, as some people include 0, but others do not.

So then, terms such as "whole, natural, and counting" do not tend to appear in textbooks?
 
on the contrary, they often do. but what sets these are may vary from textbook to textbook (different conventions), there is no "universally used definition".
 
Elements of [itex]\mathbb{Z}[/itex] are rather called 'integer' numbers than 'whole' numbers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K