- #1
matematikawan
- 338
- 0
I'm trying to understand this paper on the representation of SU(2).
I know these definitions:
A representation of a group G is a homomorphism from G to a group of operator on a vector space V. The dimension of the representation is the dimension of the vector V.
If D(g) is a matrix realization of a representation, the character [tex]\chi (g)[/tex] is the trace of D(g).
The paper I'm reading state that the dimension of the representation is the character evaluated on the unit matrix. (***)
I try to confirm this with the character formula for SU(2) which is given as
[tex]\chi^j (\theta)=\frac{\sin(j+\frac{1}{2} )\theta}{\sin \frac{\theta}{2} }[/tex]
where j labelled the irreducible representation.
So at unit matrix [tex]\chi (0) = 2j + 1[/tex] which is the correct dimension for the irreducible representation.
My question is how do we go about proving (***). I can't find the literature that proved this statement. Any clues ?
I know these definitions:
A representation of a group G is a homomorphism from G to a group of operator on a vector space V. The dimension of the representation is the dimension of the vector V.
If D(g) is a matrix realization of a representation, the character [tex]\chi (g)[/tex] is the trace of D(g).
The paper I'm reading state that the dimension of the representation is the character evaluated on the unit matrix. (***)
I try to confirm this with the character formula for SU(2) which is given as
[tex]\chi^j (\theta)=\frac{\sin(j+\frac{1}{2} )\theta}{\sin \frac{\theta}{2} }[/tex]
where j labelled the irreducible representation.
So at unit matrix [tex]\chi (0) = 2j + 1[/tex] which is the correct dimension for the irreducible representation.
My question is how do we go about proving (***). I can't find the literature that proved this statement. Any clues ?