What is the derivation of the character formula for SU(2) representation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter matematikawan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Representation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the character formula for representations of the group SU(2). Participants explore definitions and properties of group representations, specifically focusing on the character associated with these representations and its evaluation at the unit matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines a representation of a group G as a homomorphism from G to a group of operators on a vector space V, noting that the character is the trace of the matrix realization of the representation.
  • Another participant confirms that the trace of the identity matrix for a representation of dimension (2j+1) is indeed 2j+1, aligning with the dimension of the irreducible representation.
  • A later post questions the derivation of the character formula for SU(2), specifically the origin of the exponential term e^{-im\theta} in the context of the formula derived from SO(3), suggesting a connection between the two groups due to their shared Lie algebra.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions and properties of representations and characters, but there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the derivation of the character formula, particularly the source of the exponential term.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the relationship between SU(2) and SO(3) based on their Lie algebras, but these connections are not fully resolved or detailed in the posts.

matematikawan
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand this paper on the representation of SU(2).

I know these definitions:
A representation of a group G is a homomorphism from G to a group of operator on a vector space V. The dimension of the representation is the dimension of the vector V.
If D(g) is a matrix realization of a representation, the character \chi (g) is the trace of D(g).


The paper I'm reading state that the dimension of the representation is the character evaluated on the unit matrix. (***)

I try to confirm this with the character formula for SU(2) which is given as
\chi^j (\theta)=\frac{\sin(j+\frac{1}{2} )\theta}{\sin \frac{\theta}{2} }
where j labelled the irreducible representation.

So at unit matrix \chi (0) = 2j + 1 which is the correct dimension for the irreducible representation.

My question is how do we go about proving (***). I can't find the literature that proved this statement. Any clues ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the trace of the identity matrix. Count how many 1's it has down its diagonal.
 
The trace for the identity matrix (2j+1)X(2j+1) is 2j+1. That's easy!

Thank you so much ThirstyDog.
 
Really sorry I have to ask again. I'm already clear of my initial problem. My problem now is to understand the derivation for the character formula of SU(2) which is given by.
\chi^j (\theta)=\frac{\sin(j+\frac{1}{2} )\theta}{\sin \frac{\theta}{2} }

One book I'm reading now derived the above formula in the context of SO(3) as follows ( I think it should be ok because SU(2) and SO(3) share the same Lie algebra )

\chi^j (\theta)= \sum_m D^j[R_3(\theta)]_m^m <br /> = \sum_{m=-j}^{m=j} e^{-im\theta} <br /> <br /> =\frac{\sin(j+\frac{1}{2} )\theta}{\sin \frac{\theta}{2} }

I don't understand where does the exponential e^{-im\theta} comes from?

Again any clues for this?


I'm in a different time zone. It is about 2am now. I have to :zzz: and hope someone could help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K