MHB What is the determinant of a 3x3 matrix using various methods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
Click For Summary
The determinant of the 3x3 matrix A can be computed using various methods, yielding a consistent result of 4. The "Basket weaving" method calculates the determinant as 4 through a specific arrangement of products and sums. The cofactor expansion method also confirms this by simplifying the determinant to 2 times the determinant of a 2x2 matrix, which equals 4. Additionally, a row reduction technique transforms the matrix into an upper triangular form, leading to a determinant of -4, which is adjusted to 4 after accounting for a row swap. Overall, these methods demonstrate the determinant's value and the principles behind matrix operations.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\textsf{Compute the determinant of} $
$$A=\left|
\begin{array}{rrr} 1&0&2\\ 1&0&0 \\ 3&2&0\end{array}
\right|$$
$\textsf{(a)by method of Basket weaving}$
$\begin{array}{rrrrr}
1&0&2&1&0 \\ 1&0&0&1&0\\ 3&2&0&3&2
\end{array}$
$[(1)(0)(0)+(0)(0)(3)+(2)(1)(2)]-[(3)(0)(2)+(2)(0)(1)+(0)(1)(0)]$
$[4]-[0]=4$
$\textit{(b) by cofactor expression }$
$\quad\textit{$C_3$ has 2 zeros so}$
$2\begin{vmatrix}1&0\\3&2\end{vmatrix}=4$ hopefully ok
suggestions
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\textsf{Compute the determinant of} $
$$A=\left|
\begin{array}{rrr} 1&0&2\\ 1&0&0 \\ 3&2&0\end{array}
\right|$$
$\textsf{(a)by method of Basket weaving}$
$\begin{array}{rrrrr}
1&0&2&1&0 \\ 1&0&0&1&0\\ 3&2&0&3&2
\end{array}$
$[(1)(0)(0)+(0)(0)(3)+(2)(1)(2)]-[(3)(0)(2)+(2)(0)(1)+(0)(1)(0)]$
$[4]-[0]=4$
$\textit{(b) by cofactor expression }$
$\quad\textit{$C_3$ has 2 zeros so}$
$2\begin{vmatrix}1&0\\3&2\end{vmatrix}=4$ hopefully ok
suggestions

Do C2 or R2, just for practice.
 
Yet another way, using "row reduction": From [math]\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 2 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 3 & 2 & 0 \end{bmatrix}[/math] subtract the first row from the second row and three times the first row from the third row to get [math]\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & -2 \\ 0 & 2 & -6\end{bmatrix}[/math]. Then swap the second and third rows to get the upper triangular matrix [math]\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 2 \\ 0 & 2 & -6 \\ 0 & 0 & -2\end{bmatrix} which obviously has determinant [math](1)(2)(-2)= -4[/math]. Adding or subtracting one row from another does not change the determinant while swapping two rows multiplies the determinant by -1. Since we swapped rows once, the determinant of the original matrix is 4.

(The other "row operation", multiplying a row by a number, multiplies the determinant by that number.)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K