What is the difference between lumen efficiency and efficacy in lighting?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lee123456789
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
lee123456789
Messages
90
Reaction score
5
[Moderator: Moved from a homework forum. This question is not like most homework.]

Problem Statement: I have been lighting and on lumen efficiency and efficacy.
I have got bit confused between them

Im looking at metal halide and fluorescent.
when googling efficiency and efficacy for both. It give me multuple ball part ranges for them and unsure which to uses.
aswell when googling them. it say metal halide efficiency 75-100 lumen per watt and metal halide efficacy 75-100 lumen per watt. so i have got a bit confused between the two

can somebody help please
thanks
Relevant Equations: None

N/A
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
just check
so both efficiency and efficacy can be expressed as lumens per watts and percentages
 
I believe the closeness of the definitions between efficiency and efficacy, and the (apparent) frequent misuse of efficiency in this case makes this difficult to follow. It is not unusual to see dimensionless numbers (efficiency) used in place for efficacy (lumens/watt), or vice versa.

lee123456789 said:
both efficiency and efficacy can be expressed as lumens per watts and percentages

They can, but probably shouldn't be. The terminology for lumens/watt is Luminous Efficacy, rather than lumen (or luminous) efficiency. In either case, don't get bogged down. Use the comparison of lumens/watt if you are trying to compare light output with power input. Efficiency in this case is dimensionless, so it is not exactly the same.