What is the distance of the third charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter haengbon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance from the second charge (-5.0 μC) to a third charge, which is initially assumed to be neutral. The problem states that the distance between the first charge (3.0 μC) and the second charge is 40 meters. It is concluded that if the third charge is neutral, the two charges will attract each other and cannot be in equilibrium, making the problem unsolvable under these conditions. The relevant equation for this scenario is Coulomb's Law, which describes the force between charged objects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for calculating electrostatic forces
  • Understanding of electric charge types (positive, negative, neutral)
  • Concept of equilibrium in electrostatics
  • Basic principles of point charges in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Coulomb's Law in detail, focusing on its applications in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of electric field and potential around point charges
  • Learn about equilibrium conditions for multiple charges
  • Investigate the behavior of neutral charges in the presence of charged bodies
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators looking for examples of charge interactions and equilibrium concepts.

haengbon
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three point charges, 3.0 \muc, -5.0\muc and 0 \muc.

If the distance from point 1 (3.0) and point 2 (-5.0) is 40m, what is the distance from point 2 to point 3?

Homework Equations



coulombs law


[b

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to start this :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is not clear. Whether the third body is neutral?
Are they in equilibrium?
 
I'm not really sure since I only remembered this problem by memory :( but if the third body WAS neutral and they ARE in equilibrium, how would you answer this? :D
 
haengbon said:
I'm not really sure since I only remembered this problem by memory :( but if the third body WAS neutral and they ARE in equilibrium, how would you answer this? :D
If the third body WAS neutral and they cannot be in equilibrium
 
rl.bhat said:
If the third body WAS neutral and they cannot be in equilibrium

um, if that's so, is it then possible to be solved?

I need to use this formula :D ?

Fe = \frac{ Kq1q2 }{ r2 }
 
No. Just think about it. If the third body is neutral, the other two would attract each other, accelerate towards each other, and eventually collide.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
922
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K