Find the Y component of Electric field at a point

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field's y-component at point P due to a charged vertical rod. Initial attempts yielded incorrect results, with confusion over the integration process and the use of trigonometric functions. Participants emphasized the need for calculus, specifically integration, to determine the charge density and the resulting electric field components accurately. The correct approach involves considering an infinitesimal charge element and integrating over the length of the rod, leading to the final y-component answer of approximately -8700 N/C. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding charge distribution and proper integration techniques in solving electric field problems.
  • #31
I just did the integration and got -140677.0588 and that was incorrect.
I had my integral limits from 0 to 0.05 and ∫(kqy(dy)/(a(x^2+y^2)3/2))

used U substitution and was a pretty straight forward integral. not sure what I did wrong here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
isukatphysics69 said:
I just did the integration and got -140677.0588 and that was incorrect.
I had my integral limits from 0 to 0.05 and ∫(kqy(dy)/(a(x^2+y^2)3/2))

used U substitution and was a pretty straight forward integral. not sure what I did wrong here
It's much more helpful to do the integration using symbols. Plug in the numerical values later. There is virtually no way for anyone to look at the result, −140677.0588 and tell what might be wrong with it. It doesn't even have units.

That is pretty close to being the correct integral.
Having ##\ q\ ## there isn't correct. That should be ##\ \lambda\ ##, the linear charge density.
What is ' a ' ? (It's in the denominator.)
For integration limits, 0 to L .​

What do you get for the integral, prior to substituting the integration limits?.
 
  • Like
Likes isukatphysics69
  • #33
SammyS said:
It's much more helpful to do the integration using symbols. Plug in the numerical values later. There is virtually no way for anyone to look at the result, −140677.0588 and tell what might be wrong with it. It doesn't even have units.

That is pretty close to being the correct integral.
Having ##\ q\ ## there isn't correct. That should be ##\ \lambda\ ##, the linear charge density.
What is ' a ' ? (It's in the denominator.)
For integration limits, 0 to L .​

What do you get for the integral, prior to substituting the integration limits?.
I had 'a' as the length of the entire rod, I will try again
 
  • #34
This is really frustrating but I am staying calm like a monk
 
  • #35
isukatphysics69 said:
I had 'a' as the length of the entire rod, I will try again
Well in that case, that does give you a factor of q/L, which is correct and it's needed because, q/L is λ .

Making that replacement, makes your integral:
∫(kqy(dy)/(L(x2+y2)3/2)) with limits from 0 to L .

In more readable form, using LaTeX that can be written:
##\displaystyle \frac{kq}{L} \int_0^L \frac {y\,dy}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \,,\ ## where I factored out the constant factors.​
.
 
  • #36
ok I got the answer it is -8700 rounded with sig figs. Thank you @haruspex @SammyS. now I will attempt the x component since I got lucky with that one
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
891
Replies
3
Views
925
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K