MHB What is the domain for variables with cube roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Specify the domain of each variable.

1. ax + b

Here x can be any integer.

In that case the domain is R, where R is ALL REAL NUMBERS.

2. ax^(1/3) + b

Let x^(1/3) be the cube root of x.

Let D = domain

x^(1/3) is > or = 0

[x^(1/3)]^3 > or = 0^(1/3)

x > or = 0

D = {x| x > or = 0}

Is any of this right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Specify the domain of each variable.

1. ax + b

Here x can be any integer.

In that case the domain is R, where R is ALL REAL NUMBERS.

Correct, there would be no restriction we would need to impose on $x$.

RTCNTC said:
2. ax^(1/3) + b

Let x^(1/3) be the cube root of x.

Let D = domain

x^(1/3) is > or = 0

[x^(1/3)]^3 > or = 0^(1/3)

x > or = 0

D = {x| x > or = 0}

Is any of this right?

Let's think about this...what is the cube of a negative number?
 
Negative numbers can't have real number square roots, but negative numbers can have real number cube roots.

Sample: (-8)^(1/3) = -2

Back to my question.

(x)^(1/3) is the cube root of x. The domain can be any real number.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top