What is the double integral setup for kinetic energy in part (b)?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around setting up a double integral to calculate the kinetic energy of a triangular sheet of metal when spun about its centroid. The focus is on the theoretical aspects of kinetic energy, moment of inertia, and the appropriate mathematical formulation for the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the moment of inertia and its calculation, noting that the formula for kinetic energy involves the moment of inertia and angular velocity.
  • One participant asserts that the initial calculation of kinetic energy (6.67J) is incorrect and seeks clarification on how to properly find the moment of inertia and kinetic energy.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the mass per unit area (10 kg/m²) must be considered in the integral for moment of inertia, suggesting that dm should be expressed as 10dA.
  • There is a proposal to use a coordinate system to facilitate the integration over the triangular area, with suggestions to define the variables appropriately.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the correct setup of the integral and the relationship between the variables involved in the kinetic energy calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct setup for the double integral or the calculation of kinetic energy. There are competing views on how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the treatment of mass distribution and the integration process.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the assumptions made about the mass distribution and the limits of integration. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the problem setup and the mathematical relationships involved.

carl123
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
A sheet of metal in the shape of a triangle massing 10 kg per square meter is to be spun at an angular velocity of 4 radians per second about some axis perpendicular to the plane of the sheet. The triangle is a right triangle with both short sides of length 1 meter.

(a) The axis of rotation is the line through the right angle of the triangle and perpendicular to the plane of the sheet. What is the resulting kinetic energy?

(b) The axis of rotation is instead through the centroid of the triangle, or equivalently, through the center of mass of the sheet. That center of mass is two thirds of the way from any vertex to the midpoint of the side opposite it. Set up, but do not evaluate, a double integral which if evaluated would give the kinetic energy of the spinning plate. (The formula for kinetic energy is (1/2)mv2 where m denotes mass and v denotes regular speed, which is not the same thing as angular velocity.)

My solution so far:

a) Moment of inertia


I = 1/2*mrw2 = 1/2 * 10 * 0.5 * 42 = 40kgm2

w2 = v2/r
v2 = wr
v2 = 4*0.5
v = sqrt 2

KE = 1/2 * (2/3 * m) * v2
KE = 1/2 * 2/3 * 10 * (sqrt 2)2
KE = 6.67J

How do I go about part b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carl123 said:
a) Moment of inertia

I = 1/2*mrw2 = 1/2 * 10 * 0.5 * 42 = 40kgm2
The left side has dimensions of mass*distance/time2, but moment of inertia should have dimensions of mass*distance2, so your formula can't be correct.
Also 10kg is the mass per square meter, not the mass of the entire object.

The general formula for the moment of inertia is ##\int r^2dm## where r is the shortest distance to the axis of rotation, dm is the differential mass at that distance, and the integral is evaluated over all of the object's mass.

Then the kinetic energy will be one half the angular speed squared times the moment of inertia. The reason is this: ##E_{kinetic}=0.5\int v^2dm=0.5\int(\omega r)^2dm = 0.5\omega^2 \int r^2dm = 0.5\omega^2 I##
 
Thanks for your reply, so that means that the answer to part a (6.67J) is wrong. You said Ekinetic = 0.5w2I, am I supposed to find the values of w and I, then plug it into find the kinetic energy?
 
Nathanael said:
Then the kinetic energy will be one half the angular speed squared times the moment of inertia. The reason is this: ##E_{kinetic}=0.5\int v^2dm=0.5\int(\omega r)^2dm = 0.5\omega^2 \int r^2dm = 0.5\omega^2 I##
 
carl123 said:
You said Ekinetic = 0.5w2I, am I supposed to find the values of w and I, then plug it into find the kinetic energy?
Yes, but the value of ω is given (4 radians per second) so you just need to find the moment of inertia I.
 
Nathanael said:
The general formula for the moment of inertia is ∫r2dm\int r^2dm where r is the shortest distance to the axis of rotation, dm is the differential mass at that distance, and the integral is evaluated over all of the object's mass.

Since r = 1 (shortest distance to the axis of rotation)

So I = ∫ 12 dm (from 0 to 10),
I = ∫dm (from 0 to 10) ⇒ I = m (from 0 to 10) ⇒ I = 10 - 0 = 10kgm2

Therefore Kinetic Energy = 0.5 * 42 * 10 = 80J

This was what I came up with, what do you say?
 
It's not right.

10 kg/m2 is the mass per area, so dm=10dA (where dA is in units of square meters). So then the integral becomes ##I=\int r^2 dm = 10\int\int r^2 dA##

r is not a constant, it depends on which differential section of the area you are considering:
triangleinertia.png


You are going to want to find a way to integrate over the entire area. I suggest using an x-y coordinate system with the origin at the axis of rotation and the x and y directions being along the legs of the triangle. Then ##dA=dxdy##. Try to take it from there.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K