What is the effect of the dielectric material on Gauss' law?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The introduction of dielectric materials modifies Gauss' Law, represented as $$\oint _ { S } \vec { E } \cdot \vec { d S } = \frac { ( q - q _ { i } ) } { \epsilon _ { 0 } }$$. The discussion clarifies that while $$\epsilon _ { 0 }$$ is used for air or vacuum, the dielectric constant $$\epsilon$$, defined as $$\varepsilon = k \varepsilon _ { 0 }$$, should be applied in scenarios involving dielectrics. The total electric field in a capacitor with dielectric is a combination of the field without the dielectric and the field from induced polarization. The auxiliary field $$\vec{D}$$ is introduced to account for external charges, leading to the modified Gauss' Law: $$\int_S \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{S} \cdot \vec{D}=Q$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with dielectric materials and their properties
  • Knowledge of electric fields and polarization effects
  • Basic concepts of capacitors and their operation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Gauss' Law in the presence of dielectrics
  • Explore the concept of electric displacement field $$\vec{D}$$
  • Investigate the relationship between dielectric constant $$k$$ and electric field strength
  • Examine the effects of varying dielectric materials on capacitor performance
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the effects of dielectric materials on electric fields and capacitors.

Hawkingo
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
[PAGE 1]
[PAGE 2]
[PAGE 3]

so in the 2nd page,when the dielectric material is introduced the gauss's law becomes $$\oint _ { S } \vec { E } \cdot \vec { d S } = \frac { ( q - q _ { i } ) } { \epsilon _ { 0 } }$$.But my question is why the ##{ \epsilon _ { 0 } }## is in the equation.Shouldn't it be ##{ \epsilon }(\varepsilon = k \varepsilon _ { 0 })## ?And the formula becomes
$$\oint _ { S } \vec { E } \cdot \vec { d S } = \frac { ( q - q _ { i } ) } { k \varepsilon _ { 0 } }$$
Because
##{ \epsilon _ { 0 } }## is used when the medium is air or vacuum ,but here the medium is dielectric near the gaussian surface,so ##{ \epsilon }## should be used instead of ##{ \epsilon _ { 0 } }## in the gauss's law here.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The book is correct, and also the explanation is correct.

If you have the capacitor, filled with a dielectric, the total electric field inside the capacitor is a superposition of the field you'd have without the dielectric and the electric field building up through the induced polarization of the material. For not too large fields we can assume that the polarization of the matter is proportional to the electric field.

Now you introduce an auxilliary field ##\vec{D}## which is (by convention up to a factor ##\epsilon_0##) the electric field due to the charges brought externally to the system, which in your case is the charge on the capacitor plates. This field fulfills the corresponding Gauss's Law (up to the conventional factor ##\epsilon_0##),
$$\int_S \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{S} \cdot \vec{D}=Q,$$
where ##Q## is the said "extra charges".

The electric field inside the medium is then due to the above assumption
$$\vec{E}=\frac{\vec{D}}{\epsilon_0 K}.$$
Where, we've introduced the factor ##\epsilon_0## again, so that ##K## (usually called ##\epsilon_{\text{rel}}##).

Thus you get
$$\int_S \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{S} \cdot \vec{E}=\frac{Q}{\epsilon_0 K}.$$
The induced charge distribution on the surface of the dielectric (the interior is still uncharged since you have just a little shift of the negatively charged electrons against their equilibrium position relative to the positively charged atomic nuclei making up the matter, i.e., on macroscopic scales the charge distribution inside the dielectric is still 0)
$$\frac{Q}{\epsilon_0 K}=\frac{Q-Q_i}{\epsilon_0} \; \Rightarrow \; Q_i=Q \left (1-\frac{1}{K} \right)=Q \frac{K-1}{K}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawkingo

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K