What Is the Efficiency of a Monoatomic Ideal Gas Cycle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter diegzumillo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem involving a monoatomic ideal gas undergoing a reversible cycle. The original poster presents a scenario from an admission test, seeking to determine the efficiency of the gas cycle based on given parameters such as pressure, volume, and the area enclosed by the cycle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between work done and heat absorbed in the cycle, questioning the interpretation of areas under the curve in the context of thermodynamic equations. There are discussions about the internal energy variations and the classification of the system as cyclic. Some participants suggest using specific heat capacities for different paths to calculate heat transfers.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen various attempts to clarify the calculations involved in determining the efficiency. Some participants have provided guidance on the relationships between work, heat, and internal energy, while others have raised questions about assumptions made regarding heat flow and the nature of the cycle.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with visualizing equations due to formatting problems, which may affect the clarity of their explanations and calculations. There is also mention of the need to consider individual subpaths in the cycle for accurate heat calculations.

diegzumillo
Messages
180
Reaction score
20
Hello again, all! I have another basic thermodynamics question :P This one came from a 2008 admission test. Seems simple enough, but as usual, my answer doesn't match =P

Homework Statement



A monoatomic ideal gas performs, reversibly, the cycle shown in the diagram attached in this post. The values of [tex]P_0[/tex] and [tex]V_0[/tex] are, respectively, [tex]1\times 10^5 Pa[/tex] and [tex]100cm^3[/tex]. The area of the interior of the cycle is 15J. What is the efficiency of this cycle?


Homework Equations



[tex]e=\frac{W}{Q_h}[/tex]
e is the efficiency, W is work done by the system and [tex]Q_h[/tex] is the energy absorbed by the system (heat).
This is probably the only equation relevant here..


The Attempt at a Solution



The problem seemed straigh forward: The area enclosed by the cycle is the work done. The area under the curve [tex]ab[/tex] is the [tex]Q_h[/tex], right? If so, calculating this is trivial and results in an efficiency of, approximately, [tex]0,43[/tex].
However, this is not right. The correct answer should be [tex]0,136[/tex].
 

Attachments

  • problem_efficiency_engine.jpg
    problem_efficiency_engine.jpg
    2.9 KB · Views: 394
Physics news on Phys.org
No ideas? :P
 
Diego Floor said:

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem seemed straigh forward: The area enclosed by the cycle is the work done. The area under the curve [tex]ab[/tex] is the [tex]Q_h[/tex], right?
Ah, no. That area would be the work done from a to b.

Q is T dS, and W is P dV.

The easiest way to get Q, for any single path of this cycle, is to use

ΔU = Q - W

since ΔU and W are fairly straightforward to calculate.
 
Last edited:
Redbelly you are smart!
 
Thanks Redbelly :) I got carried away by the relation [tex]W=Q_h-Q_c[/tex] and assumed something wrong :P

Can I classify this system as cyclic? If so, isn't the internal energy variation supposed to be zero?
 
abhikesbhat said:
Redbelly you are smart!
Gosh, thank you.

Diego Floor said:
Thanks Redbelly :) I got carried away by the relation [tex]W=Q_h-Q_c[/tex] and assumed something wrong :P

Can I classify this system as cyclic? If so, isn't the internal energy variation supposed to be zero?
Yes, the entire process is cyclic, and ΔU is zero for the entire cycle.

But ... to calculate Qh, you'll need to consider each individual subpath, and whether heat is flowing into or out of the system for that path. Heat in contributes to Qh, while heat out does not.

Since ΔU is not necessarily zero for each subpath, it needs to be considered.
 
Hello again! I let go of this problems for a few days. But today I took another look at it, and I think I have a solution :)

We'll use this equation for heat
[tex]Q=C\Delta T[/tex]
where this C depends on the path.
We can start by calculating the heat for the path BC and CA, we'll call them [tex]Q_{bc}[/tex] and [tex]Q_{ca}[/tex], respectively. We cannot calculate directly [tex]Q_{ab}[/tex] because we only know [tex]c_p=3/2 R[/tex], for constant pressure, and [tex]c_v=5/2 R[/tex], for constant volume. So we have
[tex]Q_{bc}=\frac{c_v}{R}(P_c V_c - P_b V_b)=-45J[/tex]
[tex]Q_{ca}=\frac{c_p}{R}(P_a V_a - P_c V_c)=-50J[/tex]
(I'm calling [tex]P_i[/tex] and [tex]V_i[/tex] for better understanding)

We can see that both of those values represent heat leaving the system. Now we'll use the internal energy relations to find [tex]Q_{ab}[/tex]. The internal energy relations for each path are:
[tex]\Delta U_{bc}=Q_{bc}-W_{bc}[/tex] (Yes, [tex]W_{bc}[/tex] is zero)
[tex]\Delta U_{ca}=Q_{ca}-W_{ca}[/tex]
Since we know that
[tex]\Delta U=\Delta U_{ab}+\Delta U_{bc}+\Delta U_{ca}=0[/tex]
and
[tex]\Delta U_{ab}=A_{ab}-W_{ab}[/tex]
We have
[tex]Q_{ab}=W_{ab}-(Q_{bc}-W_{bc}+Q_{ca}-W_{ca})[/tex]
[tex]Q_{ab}=W-(Q_{bc}+Q_{ca})=110J[/tex]
which is our heat transferred into the system! ([tex]Q_h[/tex])

In possession of these values, we can now calculate the efficiency of this cycle:
[tex]e=\frac{W}{Q_h}=13,6%[/tex]

=D

(Btw, for some strange reason, I can't visualize correctly the formulas. So there may be some errors. I'll correct them as soon as I'm able to read what I wrote :P)
 
Latex equations have been having problems for several days now.

Much of what you wrote can be done without Latex. You can get the Greek letter Δ here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=347

Also:

[noparse]a[/noparse] for subscript a
[noparse]2[/noparse] for superscript 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yep.. just saw the anouncement. What a bummer!

Since there is no estimate for the return, I'll post the solution again! (But I'll keep that one there... it took me a while to do! :P)
 
  • #10
The solution again. Simplified notation version :D

We'll use this equation for heat
Q=CΔT
where this C depends on the path.
We can start by calculating the heat for the path BC and CA, we'll call them Qbc and Qca, respectively. We cannot calculate directly Qab because we only know cp=3/2 R, for constant pressure, and cv=5/2 R constant volume. So we have
Qbc=cv/R (PcVc-PbVb)=-45J

Qca=cp/R (PaVa-PcVc)=-50J

(I'm calling Pi and Vi for better understanding before using the values given by P0 and V0)

We can see that both of those values represent heat leaving the system. Now we'll use the internal energy relations to find Qab. The internal energy relations for each path are:
ΔUbc=Qbc-Wbc (Yes, Wbc is zero)
ΔUca=Qca-Wca

Since we know that
ΔU=ΔUab+ΔUbc+ΔUca=0
and
ΔUab=Qab-Wab
We have
Qab=Wab-(Qbc-Wbc+Qca-Wca)
Qab=W - (Qbc+Qca) = 110J
which is our heat transferred into the system! (Qh)

In possession of these values, we can now calculate the efficiency of this cycle:
e=W/Qh=13,6%

=D

Thanks again Redbelly! And btw, that's a really helpful list of symbols! :) Especially for this dark times without latex.. lol
 
  • #11
Diego Floor said:
... cp=3/2 R, for constant pressure, and cv=5/2 R constant volume.
It looks like the values of cv and cp have been swapped here, but you did use the correct values in the calculation. Good job, you nailed this one!

Thanks again Redbelly! And btw, that's a really helpful list of symbols! :) Especially for this dark times without latex.. lol
You're welcome. "Dark times", LOL
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K