What is the Eigenvalue for a Harmonic Oscillator?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvalue for a harmonic oscillator using the Hamiltonian operator and a trial wave function. The original poster presents the Hamiltonian for a particle in a harmonic potential and attempts to solve the energy eigenvalue equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the Hamiltonian to the trial wave function and is seeking a value for the constant 'a' that eliminates dependence on 'x'. Some participants question the correctness of the original poster's application of the Hamiltonian and suggest checking for errors in the formulation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's approach, offering guidance on identifying errors and suggesting ways to simplify the equation. There is acknowledgment of a sign error and a discussion about ensuring the correct number of factors of 'a' in the terms involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the possibility of isolating 'a' without involving 'x', indicating a potential misunderstanding of the problem setup. There is a focus on ensuring the parameters are chosen correctly to facilitate the solution.

Habeebe
Messages
37
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The Hamiltonian for a particle in a harmonic potential is given by
[itex]\hat{H}=\frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}+\frac{Kx^2}{2}[/itex], where K is the spring constant. Start with the trial wave function [itex]\psi(x)=exp(\frac{-x^2}{2a^2})[/itex]
and solve the energy eigenvalue equation [itex]\hat{H}\psi(x)=E\psi(x)[/itex]. You must find the value of the constant, a, which will make applying the Hamiltonian to the function return a constant time[sic, I assume he meant "times"] the function. Then find the energy eigenvalue.

Homework Equations


[itex]\hat{H}=\frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}+\frac{Kx^2}{2}[/itex]
[itex]\psi(x)=exp(\frac{-x^2}{2a^2})[/itex]
[itex]\hat{H}\psi(x)=E\psi(x)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Application of the Hamiltonian gave me:
[itex]\hat{H}\psi(x)=[\frac{h^2}{2m}(\frac{1}{a^2}+\frac{x^2}{a^2})+\frac{1}{2}Kx^2]\psi(x)=E\psi(x)[/itex]

If I understand the problem correctly, since E and a must be constant, I must come up with an a, devoid of any x's or functions of x's so taking the Hamiltonian will yield something equally devoid of x's and functions of x's.

I mean, I get that I should have [itex][\frac{h^2}{2m}(\frac{1}{a^2}+\frac{x^2}{a^2})+\frac{1}{2}Kx^2]=E[/itex] for some constants E, a. The problem is, I have no clue how to go about solving that and getting a to not involve any x's, nor am I convinced that it's possible. Using the quadratic formula on it gives a big mess (involving x), so I'm pretty sure that's the wrong route.

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a sign error: How is the operator [itex]\hat{p}[/itex] defined?

To remove x from the equation, collect the terms with x2. You have to choose the parameter a properly, so as the two terms cancel each other.


ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Also check to see if you have enough factors of ##a## in the denominator of your ##x^2/a^2## term.
 
Thanks, I found the sign error and got it worked out. As for the factors of a, you're right, I actually typed it in wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K