What is the Einstein Velocity Addition Formula and How Does It Work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Einstein Velocity Addition Formula, particularly in the context of two ships moving towards each other at relativistic speeds. Participants explore the implications of this formula on the perceived velocities of the ships at the moment of collision, questioning how these velocities relate to the speed of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where two ships are moving towards each other at 0.7c and questions the resulting collision velocity, suggesting it appears to violate common sense.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the term "X" in the context of velocity addition, indicating that common sense may mislead in physics.
  • A different participant asserts that "C + X" could imply adding velocities, but emphasizes that this shorthand requires the use of Einstein's velocity addition formula.
  • One participant provides the formula for relativistic velocity addition, explaining how it applies when one object is a light beam, concluding that the speed remains c.
  • Another participant suggests that the term "Lorentz velocities" should be used, attributing the addition of velocities to Lorentz's work.
  • A participant reiterates the initial scenario, stating that in the reference frame of the collision point, the ships approach with a relative velocity of 1.4c, but clarifies that this does not contradict special relativity since no single object exceeds c.
  • One participant proposes a method for calculating adjusted mass and momentum during the collision, suggesting a different approach to the problem than initially presented.
  • Another participant encourages the use of the relativistic addition of velocities formula for clarity and ease in discussions about relative speeds.
  • A participant expresses a desire for the formula and explanation to be included in the Frequently Asked Questions section of the forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of velocities in the context of the collision scenario. While some agree on the application of the Einstein velocity addition formula, others raise questions about the implications and clarity of the situation, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made regarding reference frames and the interpretation of velocities. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps involved in applying the velocity addition formula.

freydawg56
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/relativ/einvel.html#c1

ok, so I'm looking at this, and i see that
where c = speed of light
if ship A is moving at .7c to the right ===> <=== and ship B moving .7c to the left

and they are both on the same line and about to collide, at what velocity (in C) will they hit each other.

the reference point is the collision point of impact not some distant observer.

Theory i read appears that C + X = C but this seems to violate common sense.
I can even imagine that you can't possible surpass the speed of light, but can someone make this a little more obvious.

Thanks, and this is not a HW question, I'm in EE. I'm just asking for the fun of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
freydawg56 said:
Theory i read appears that C + X = C

What is X exactly? By the way, common sense will lead you to dark alleys and beat you to death in physics.
 
Last edited:
X is anything positive , so basically C+ 2C = C because i thought the speed of light is the max possible speed.
 
The problem is that "C+ V" is shorthand for adding the velocities according to Einstein's formula for addition of velocities. If two objects move directily toward one another, with speed u and v relative to some third frame of reference, then the speed of each, in the other's frame of reference ("U+ V") is
\frac{u+ v}{1+ \frac{uv}{c^2}}.


In particular, if one is a light beam, with speed u= c, then its speed ("C+ V"), relative to the other, is
\frac{c+ v}{1+ \frac{cv}{c^2}}= \frac{c+v}{1+ \frac{v}{c}}= \frac{c(c+v)}{c+ v}= c
 
And we should say Lorentz velocities. He did the addition first. Physics is a team sport (sort of).
 
freydawg56 said:
ok, so I'm looking at this, and i see that
where c = speed of light
if ship A is moving at .7c to the right ===> <=== and ship B moving .7c to the left

and they are both on the same line and about to collide, at what velocity (in C) will they hit each other.

the reference point is the collision point of impact not some distant observer.

In the reference frame where the collision point is stationary, clearly ship A and ship B are approaching each other with a relative velocity 1.4c. This doesn't contradict anything in special relativity though, since there is no single object being measured at a speed greater than c. (And of course if you are in one of the ships, the velocity of the other ship can be determined using Einstein's velocity addition formula, and it will be less than c, as expected.)
 
You could (should for simplicity?) say one is moving -.7c and one .7c with respect to the collision point. You would then calculate their adjusted mass+momentum (and resulting change from collision) as the function F=2*f(0.7c), and not F=f(.7c+.7c) as you suggest
 
Just use the relativistic addition of velocities formula and plug in the relative velocities of each reference frame...
 
Halls of Ivy..glad you posted that formula...I was just thinking earlier today using that would make these repeated discussions on relative speeds easier...and if anybody searches they'll actually be able to do their own computation...
 
  • #10
Why isn't the formula and explanation posted in Frequently asked Questions??

I can't find the input page for doing it, but if someone can identify it and it's not alread there, I'll draft a submission...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K