What Is the End Correction in Resonance Column Experiments?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of end correction in resonance column experiments, specifically in determining the speed of sound in air. End correction accounts for the discrepancy between the physical length of the tube and the effective length of the resonating air column, as the antinode extends slightly beyond the tube's opening. The experiment involves adjusting water levels in a tube to find resonance points, which should theoretically align with quarter and half wavelengths. Participants express confusion about the setup and calculations needed for the end correction and sound velocity. Understanding the resonance column method and the significance of end correction is crucial for accurately solving the problems presented.
chaoseverlasting
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


In the experiment of the determination of the speed of sound in air using the resonance column method the length of the air column that resonantes in the fundamental mode with a tuning fork is 0.1m. When this length is changed to 0.35m, the same tuning fork resonates with the first overtone. Calculate the end correction.


In a resonance tube, a tuning fork of 512 hz resonates with the tube. The first resonance gives a 30.7cm rise of water level and the second one gives 63.2 cm rise. Calculate the error in calculating the velocity of sound in air.

Homework Equations



\nu = (2n-1)v/4L or \nu =nv/2L


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know what the end correction is or what the resonance air column method is. Is the pipe open at both ends or at just one end? And what do they mean by end correction. If someone could explain the experiment to me, I could probably solve the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should describe the experiment. You don't seem to have made much effort.
 
In the first question, the second resonant length is about 3 times the first length. In the second question, it is about 2 times the first length. That tells you whether the tubes were open or closed in each case.

The "end correction" means that the length of the resonating air column is not exactly the same as the length of the tube. It equals L+C where L is the length of the tube and C is the correction. The resonant frequencies are always exactly the same as the tuning fork frequency.

I don't understand exactly what they want you to do in the second question.
 
chaoseverlasting said:

Homework Statement


In the experiment of the determination of the speed of sound in air using the resonance column method the length of the air column that resonantes in the fundamental mode with a tuning fork is 0.1m. When this length is changed to 0.35m, the same tuning fork resonates with the first overtone. Calculate the end correction.


In a resonance tube, a tuning fork of 512 hz resonates with the tube. The first resonance gives a 30.7cm rise of water level and the second one gives 63.2 cm rise. Calculate the error in calculating the velocity of sound in air.

Homework Equations



\nu = (2n-1)v/4L or \nu =nv/2L


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know what the end correction is or what the resonance air column method is. Is the pipe open at both ends or at just one end? And what do they mean by end correction. If someone could explain the experiment to me, I could probably solve the question.


It's a tube partialy filled with water. One end is open to air with a source of sound placed near the opening. The setup is such that one may vary the level of the water thereby changing the length of the air column (which is basically the distance between the water level and the opening of the tube).

The idea is then to keep the frequency fixed to some value and to adjust the level of the water until one hears a resonance. In *theory*, the first resonance (corresponding to the the water level being the closest to the opening of the tube hence the smallest length of the air column) should be at a quarter of a wavelength. The distance between each resonance should be half a wavelength. In practice, the distance between adjacent resonance is indeed half a wavelength but the first resonance is not exactly at a quarter of wavelength (because the antinode is not exactly at the rim but extends slightly outside of the opening of the tube). The difference between the actual length of the air column for the first resonance and lambda/4 is what they call the "correction".

Hope this helps

Patrick
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K