What is the energy cost of making silicon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LordChallen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Silicon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The energy cost to produce 1m² of crystalline silicon photovoltaic (PV) panels is approximately 250 kWh, as established by a study from Fthenakis, Kim, and Alsema (2008). The process involves converting silicon dioxide (sand) into pure silicon using carbon, which releases carbon oxides. The energy payback time for solar panels is estimated to be between 2.5 to 3.5 years, with panels generating energy for 20 to 25 years, yielding an energy output that can be up to eight times the energy input. The cost of bulk crystalline silicon fluctuates between 1 to 2 dollars/euro per kilogram, with significant competition from large-scale manufacturers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photovoltaic (PV) technology
  • Knowledge of silicon production processes
  • Familiarity with energy payback calculations
  • Awareness of carbon dioxide emissions and environmental impact
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest advancements in silicon production techniques
  • Explore the lifecycle analysis of solar panels
  • Investigate the economic factors affecting solar panel pricing
  • Learn about carbon capture and its role in mitigating CO2 emissions
USEFUL FOR

Environmental scientists, renewable energy engineers, solar panel manufacturers, and anyone interested in the sustainability and economic viability of solar energy production.

LordChallen
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to determine how much energy it takes to melt down sand into silicon, and convert it to solar panels.

any info would be great.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
Bulk crystalline Silicon is sold for industrial purposes at about 1 or 2 dollars/euro for a Kg, though prices fluctuate of course.
That's the stuff you need to make solar panels, not melted sand.
Sand is (mostly) Silicon Dioxide, to make the pure Silicon the oxygen needs to be taken away.
Usually this is done using Carbon which robs the Oxygen from the Silicon, and releases it as Carbon Oxides.
I guess the major cost involved in the process would be supplying the heavy duty heating that is needed for the reaction to occur.
 
Thank you for the reply. Yes I am trying to find the cost of creating solar panels in terms of carbon and energy. So far it looks like you get about 3 times your investment back out of the solar panels. Of course this depends upon the location of the solar panels. Some countries have better solar exposure. In the early days of solar I heard that there wasn't much benefit besides the off-grid feature of solar panels. I was trying to find out if that was still true.
 
Does anyone know the standard rate of repair that the Earth can return carbon dioxide to oxygen?
 
LordChallen said:
Thank you for the reply. Yes I am trying to find the cost of creating solar panels in terms of carbon and energy. So far it looks like you get about 3 times your investment back out of the solar panels.

The reference I posted says the energy payback time is around 2.5 to 3.5 years. However the panels might generate for 20 to 25 years. That suggests they produce around 8 times the energy it takes to make them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
I think it might be difficult to make solar panels from scratch in a small scale workshop, even if you start with already purified Silicon.
You'll be competing with very large industries (In China especially), who mass produce solar panels and sell them in millions inexpensively.
You might save some cost by hand assembling banks of photovoltaic cells- the active components of a completed panel into your own panel design.
The result may not perform any better than the 'off the shelf' panels though.
 
LordChallen said:
Does anyone know the standard rate of repair that the Earth can return carbon dioxide to oxygen?

It appears to be about half the rate we are producing it and reducing according to...

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/c...de-emissions-says-report-20140909-10ejo1.html

Michael Raupach, formerly of the CSIRO and now at the Australian National University, said land and oceans take up about half of all CO2 emissions and help show the pace of global warming.

Despite some year-to-year variability, particularly on land, a pattern is emerging over decades suggesting the sinks "are not keeping pace with rising CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere", Professor Raupach said.

"This is partly a sign that the efficiencies of the all-important land and ocean CO2 sinks are weakening," he said.

Professor Raupach was lead author of a paper published in Biogeosciences in July which showed that during the 1959-2012 period, about 44 per cent of the total anthropogenic CO2 emissions remained in the atmosphere. During the period, the combined land and ocean CO2 sink rate declined by about one-third.
 
  • #10
rootone said:
Bulk crystalline Silicon is sold for industrial purposes at about 1 or 2 dollars/euro for a Kg, though prices fluctuate of course.
...
That appears to be about an order of magnitude too low. [ref: $20/kg China] [ref: $11.50-$17.50/kg]
But I like CWatters reference better: 250 kwh/m2
Though, it should be noted, that his reference is 9 years old.
From a website I just found: "the degradation rate is less than 0.5% for panels made before 2000, and less than 0.4% for panels made after 2000. That means that a panel manufactured today should produce 92% of its original power after 20 years" [ref]

From some silly calculations I've just done, a modern solar panel won't degrade to 50% until it's 125 years old, by which time it will have produced 24,270 kwh of energy.
Which to me, looks like it will have produced 100 times as much energy as it took to produce it.

Of course, lots of people want to see a return on their investment, in their lifetime. So this is just "crazy" talk, on my part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K