What Is the Energy Difference in the Stern-Gerlach Experiment with Silver Atoms?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the energy difference in the Stern-Gerlach experiment using silver atoms, specifically with a magnetic field of 0.500 T. The user initially derived the energy difference formula as deltaE = hbar*(e/2m)*g*B, where g is the g-factor (2.00232). However, it was concluded that using the simplified value of g = 2 yields an acceptable approximation for practical calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of significant figures in physics calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin and angular momentum.
  • Familiarity with the Stern-Gerlach experiment and its principles.
  • Knowledge of fundamental constants such as the Bohr magneton (Ub), charge of the electron (e), and mass of the electron (m).
  • Basic proficiency in handling equations involving magnetic fields and energy calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the Stern-Gerlach experiment and its implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the significance of the g-factor in quantum physics and its variations.
  • Explore the concept of significant figures and their importance in scientific calculations.
  • Investigate the effects of vacuum fluctuations on particle properties and how they influence experimental results.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, experimental physics, or anyone interested in the implications of the Stern-Gerlach experiment on atomic behavior.

big man
Messages
242
Reaction score
0
OK I just have one more question haha.

Question:
Consider the original Stern-Gerlach experiment employing an atomic beam of silver, for which the magnetic moment is due entirely to the spin of the single valence electron of the silver atom. Assuming the magnetic field B has a magnitude 0.500 T, compute the energy difference in electron volts of the silver atoms in the two exiting beams.

What I've done:

So we're looking at an electron, which has a spin quantum number of s=1/2.
So the z component of the spin angular momentum will be.

Sz = ms*hbar

Where ms is the spin magnetic quantum number. There are two different orientations of 1/2 and -1/2 that result in the different defelctions of the beams.

So the energy for ms = 1/2 is:

E = (1/2)*hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

And for ms = -1/2

E = (-1/2)*hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

To find the energy difference I subtracted the two energies, which yielded:

deltaE = hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

e is the charge of the electron and m is the mass of the electron and g is the g factor (g = 2.00232).

So the above equation can now be expressed as

deltaE = Ub*g*B

Where Ub is the bohr magneton.

But this answer is wrong. It would work out if I didn't use the refined value of g and just used 2.

What am I doing wrong?
Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
big man said:
OK I just have one more question haha.

Question:
Consider the original Stern-Gerlach experiment employing an atomic beam of silver, for which the magnetic moment is due entirely to the spin of the single valence electron of the silver atom. Assuming the magnetic field B has a magnitude 0.500 T, compute the energy difference in electron volts of the silver atoms in the two exiting beams.

What I've done:

So we're looking at an electron, which has a spin quantum number of s=1/2.
So the z component of the spin angular momentum will be.

Sz = ms*hbar

Where ms is the spin magnetic quantum number. There are two different orientations of 1/2 and -1/2 that result in the different defelctions of the beams.

So the energy for ms = 1/2 is:

E = (1/2)*hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

And for ms = -1/2

E = (-1/2)*hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

To find the energy difference I subtracted the two energies, which yielded:

deltaE = hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

e is the charge of the electron and m is the mass of the electron and g is the g factor (g = 2.00232).

So the above equation can now be expressed as

deltaE = Ub*g*B

Where Ub is the bohr magneton.

But this answer is wrong. It would work out if I didn't use the refined value of g and just used 2.

What am I doing wrong?
Cheers
I am not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean that you would get the correct answer if you used g =2 instead of 2.00232?

If this what you mean than two comments: a) if you work within three sig figs, it does not make any difference and b) most elementary books use g=2, i.e. they neglect vacuum fluctuations effects.

So if this is your only problem, I would say to use g=2 and not worry about the difference of one part in a thousand
 
yeah that was my only problem. I just wasn't sure if the book wants you to use g = 2.00232 or not. But yeah I'll just stick with using 2 then.
Cheers for that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K