MHB What is the expected outcome of a game of chance with varying probabilities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aprilryan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
aprilryan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I have one more probability problem for you. I just don't know where to begin with this one.

"In a game of chance you have a 30% chance of winning $\$5$, a 50% chance of losing $\$4$ and a 20% chance of breaking even. What is your expected profit or loss?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So you need to take each outcome (positive = winning, negative = losing), multiply each one by its probability, and add it all up.
 
Let me get this straight:

I multiply 5 times 30 percent or 0.3
I also multiply 4 times 50% or 0.5
Then I add the sums of these two correct?

What do I do with the 20%?
 
Break even means no profit nor loss. Let $X$ be your profit, then $X$ is a random variable defined as (watch the signs!):$$ X = \left \{ \begin{array}{lll} 5, \quad & p = 0.3 \\ -4, \quad & p = 0.5 \\ 0, \quad & p = 0.2 \end{array} \right. $$Then the expected profit is given by $\mathbb{E}[X] = 5(0.3)+(-4)(0.5) = - 0.5$. This means that you expect a negative profit or hence a loss of $0.5 \$ $.

On the other hand, it's completely similar to say, let $Y$ be the loss, then $Y$ is a random variable defined as:$$ Y = \left \{ \begin{array}{lll} -5, \quad & p = 0.3 \\ 4, \quad & p = 0.5 \\ 0, \quad & p = 0.2 \end{array} \right. $$The expected loss is given by $\mathbb{E}[Y] = -5(0.3)+4(0.5) = 0.5$. Hence your expected loss is $0.5 \$$ which is exactly the same answer as above. It does not matter how you define the r.v as a loss of profit as long as you understand that a negative profit is a loss and vice versa.
 
Thanks Siron, this really helped break down everything for me! Thank you Ackbach for your assistance as well!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top