What is the final velocity of the car in an elastic collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypnos_16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Collision
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an elastic collision between a stationary van and a moving car. The van has a mass of 1056 kg and is initially at rest, while the car has a mass of 705 kg and is traveling at a velocity of +2.45 m/s. The objective is to determine the final velocity of the car after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of momentum and energy in elastic collisions. There are attempts to isolate the final velocity of the car, and questions arise regarding whether the vehicles stick together after the collision. Some participants express confusion about the implications of the collision being elastic.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the collision scenario. Some have suggested re-evaluating the conservation equations, while others are questioning the assumptions made about the collision type. Guidance has been provided regarding the need to apply both conservation of momentum and energy to solve for the final velocities.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of elastic collisions, including the need to account for two unknown final velocities. There is uncertainty regarding the initial conditions and the interpretation of the problem statement.

Hypnos_16
Messages
148
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A 1056-kg van, stopped at a traffic light, is hit directly in the rear by a 705-kg car traveling with a velocity of +2.45 m/s. Assume that the transmission of the van is in neutral, the brakes are not being applied, and the collision is elastic. What is the final velocity of the car?

Van
m = 1056kg
v = 0
p = 0

Car
m = 705
v = 2.45
p = 1727.3

Homework Equations



i know that in this kind of collision problem the momentums would add
mv + mv = mv
the mass and velocities of the two vehicles would add because they would both wind up going the same way, the trouble I'm having is isolating just the speed of the car.


The Attempt at a Solution



mv + mv = mv
(1056)(0) + (705)(2.45) = (1761)v
0 + 1727.3 = 1761v
1727.3 = 1761v
v = 0.981m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hypnos_16 said:
and the collision is elastic.
If the collision is elastic, the vehicles do not stick together after the collision. (Unless this is a misprint, which I suspect it is.)
 
okay, suppose it is a misprint, and that the two cars do stick to one another, how would i go about isolating juts the speed of the car?
 
Hypnos_16 said:
okay, suppose it is a misprint, and that the two cars do stick to one another, how would i go about isolating juts the speed of the car?
If they stick together, then they have the same speed. Just like you calculated.
 
then it must not be a misprint, because the answer i got there isn't the correct answer, i guess they don't stick together.
 
Hypnos_16 said:
then it must not be a misprint, because the answer i got there isn't the correct answer, i guess they don't stick together.
In that case you need to redo your conservation of momentum equation. But that's not enough--what else is conserved in an elastic collision?
 
Momentum and Energy are Conserved. so if momentum in conserved would pf = pi ?
 
Hypnos_16 said:
Momentum and Energy are Conserved.
Good.
so if momentum in conserved would pf = pi ?
Yes.
 
so then, since his mass didn't increase, his final velocity should be the same has his initial velocity? that doesn't seem to make sense
 
  • #10
Hypnos_16 said:
so then, since his mass didn't increase, his final velocity should be the same has his initial velocity? that doesn't seem to make sense
The total momentum is conserved, not the momentum of each car separately.
 
  • #11
But in this case wouldn't total momentum be juts the value of the car's momentum since it's the only thing moving?

∑p = p1 + p2
∑p = (705)(2.45) + 0
∑p = 1727.3

then wouldn't v then just be 2.45m/s again?
 
  • #12
Hypnos_16 said:
But in this case wouldn't total momentum be juts the value of the car's momentum since it's the only thing moving?
Yes.

∑p = p1 + p2
∑p = (705)(2.45) + 0
∑p = 1727.3
OK.

then wouldn't v then just be 2.45m/s again?
No. After the collision you'll have two speeds to worry about.
 
  • #13
So if there are now two speeds to work, would both speeds be the same?
∑p = p1 + p2
∑p = (705)(2.45) + 0
∑p = 1727.3

just divide the momentum in two, half going to one vehicle and the other half going to the other vehicle

so
Car = p = mv
863.7 = (705)v
v = (1.23m/s)?
 
  • #14
Hypnos_16 said:
So if there are now two speeds to work, would both speeds be the same?
No.

just divide the momentum in two, half going to one vehicle and the other half going to the other vehicle
No.

You must apply conservation of momentum and energy to solve for the speeds.
 
  • #15
But how can i solve for two variables if i know nothing about their speeds after the collision?
 
  • #16
Hypnos_16 said:
But how can i solve for two variables if i know nothing about their speeds after the collision?
The speeds after the collision are what you are trying to find. You'll have two equations and two unknowns. Just right.
 
  • #17
Okay i think i screwed something up,
i have the ∑p = 1727.3
so i use that as Pf = Pi
Pi = 1727.3
so that what?
1727.3 = mv?
and just input the masses one at a time back into m?
 
  • #18
Hypnos_16 said:
Okay i think i screwed something up,
i have the ∑p = 1727.3
so i use that as Pf = Pi
Pi = 1727.3
so that what?
That's the total momentum.
1727.3 = mv?
and just input the masses one at a time back into m?
No. Use the full version of the conservation of momentum equation:

[tex]m_1\vec{v}_1= m_1\vec{v}_1{ '} + m_2\vec{v}_2{ '}[/tex]

You'll also need an equation for conservation of energy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
962
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K