What is the Force at Point A in a 3-Dimensional Cable System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Northbysouth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Point Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the forces at point A in a three-dimensional cable system, specifically focusing on the tensions in the cables and the resultant force at the ball joint. The context includes homework-related problem-solving and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculated the tensions T1 and T2 to be 71.1512 kN and 60.749 kN, respectively, but struggled with finding the force at point A.
  • The participant attempted to use equilibrium equations in the x, y, and z directions to find the components of the force at A.
  • Another participant suggested that the angles did not need to be calculated explicitly and that using the cosine directly would simplify the process.
  • There was a discussion about the appropriate trigonometric functions to use for calculating angles, with some confusion regarding the use of arctan versus arccos.
  • A later reply clarified that the unit vector along T1 could be used to derive the components of the force directly, leading to a corrected calculation of the force at A.
  • The final calculation provided by the original poster yielded a force of 61.9053 kN at point A, which was confirmed as correct by the participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants expressed differing views on the necessity of calculating angles and the appropriate trigonometric functions to use. The discussion included corrections and refinements to earlier claims, but no consensus was reached on the initial approach taken by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the geometry of the cable system and the definitions of angles were not explicitly stated, which may have contributed to the confusion in calculations. The discussion also highlighted the importance of using unit vectors in resolving forces.

Northbysouth
Messages
241
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



If the weight of the boom is negligible compared with the applied 45-kN load, determine the cable tensions T1 and T2 and the force acting at the ball joint at A.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have successfully calculated the tensions in T1 and T2 to be 71.1512 kN and 60.749kN respectively.

But I've been having a lot of difficulty calculating the forces at point A. My attempt is as follows:

ƩFx = 0

-T2 + T1cos(θx) + Ax

θx = arccos(9/15.81) where 15.81 is the length of the cable T1

Ax = 60.749 - 71.1512cos(55.304)
Ax = 20.2481

ƩFy = 0

θy = arctan (15/9)
θy = 59.036

0 = t1cos(59.036) - 45 + Ay
Ay = 8.393

ƩFz = 0
θz = arctan(10.2956/12) where 10.2956 is the length from A to C.
θz = 40.62857

0 = Az - 71.1512cos(40.62857)
Az = 53.999

A = \sqrt{}20.2481^2 + 8.393^2 + 53.999^2
A = 58.278

It says my answer is wrong and I don't see where I'm going wrong. Help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Statics hwk 12 3.106.png
    Statics hwk 12 3.106.png
    17.6 KB · Views: 851
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Northbysouth! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
Northbysouth said:
ƩFx = 0

-T2 + T1cos(θx) + Ax

θx = arccos(9/15.81) where 15.81 is the length of the cable T1

Ax = 60.749 - 71.1512cos(55.304)
Ax = 20.2481

yes :smile:, but there was no need to find the actual angle

all you needed to know in -T2 + T1cos(θx) + Ax was cosx) …

which you know is 9/15.81 ! :wink:

i don't understand why you then used tan for the y and z directions, instead of the cos you used for the x direction :confused:

try it the same way :smile:

(if it helps, you can visualise the tension T1 as replaced by forces of relative magnitudes 9:5:-12 along the x y and z axes)
 
I'm not sure I completely understand what you're saying.

When I was calculating the angles I imagined that the origin was at point B. From there I then used trigonometry to determine what angle the force T1 made with each axis.

So, when I was determining θy I visualized a right angle triangle that went from B to C and then directly back to the y-axis at B.

Are you saying that I should use arccos instead of arctan when I'm calculating the angles at θy and θz?
 
Northbysouth said:
So, when I was determining θy I visualized a right angle triangle that went from B to C and then directly back to the y-axis at B.

not following you :confused:

let's see what you did …
Northbysouth said:
θy = arctan (15/9)

where does the 15 come from?

(i can see a 15, but it's a hyptoneuse, and it's the wrong angle)

the unit vector along T1 is (9,5,-12)/15.81 …

the cosines are the individual coordinates :smile:
 
I understand what you mean when you said that I didn't need to calculate the angles.

Using the unit vector of T1 = <9, 5, -12>/\sqrt{}250

I multiplied the components i, j and k by the force to get the magnitude of the force in the x, y and z direction. From there it was simple to calculate Ax, Ay and Az

The answer I got for A is 61.9053 kN, which is correct.

Thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K