What is the formula for calculating pump power and efficiency?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The formula for calculating pump power is defined as Power of the pump = Maximum back pressure * maximum flow rate / 2. This equation incorporates the assumption that flow rate is a linear function of load pressure, which is often not the case in practical applications. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between pressure, flow rate, and pump efficiency, particularly in the context of micropumps. The estimated thermodynamic efficiency (ηest) for micropumps is calculated using the formula ηest = 0.25Qmax * delta pmax / P, where Qmax is the maximum flow rate, delta pmax is the maximum pressure difference, and P is the power input.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with pump performance metrics
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic efficiency calculations
  • Basic grasp of control volume analysis in fluid systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of pump power equations in fluid dynamics
  • Study the relationship between pressure and flow rate in pumps
  • Learn about micropump design and performance evaluation
  • Explore the application of the first law of thermodynamics in fluid systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid dynamics specialists, and researchers involved in pump design and efficiency optimization will benefit from this discussion.

hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
How do we define the power of a pump?
I read a formula from a book which defines the power of the pump as follows:

Power of the pump = Maximum back pressure * maximum flow rate / 2

Can anyone explain why the right hand side equals the left hand side?

I don't understand why the LHS is divided by a factor of 2.

And, is the power of a pump always the same value, no matter at any flow rate/back pressure?

It seems to be that at maximum back pressure, the flow rate is zero and the pump power is zero then?

Please help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi hanson,
If you draw a control volume around a pump you'll note the following.
1. There is power going in, in the form of electricity, shaft power or other.
2. There is enthalpy going in. That's your fluid entering the control volume.
3. There is enthalpy leaving. That's your fluid leaving the control volume at a higher pressure.

There could be other forms of energy entering or leaving, but those are the basic ones. For a pump, we generally don't consider aftercoolers part of the pump itself because a pump is for liquids which are relatively incompressible.

Now if you apply the first law to the control volume, you find that the power is equal to the difference in enthalpy. The enthalpy out minus the enthalpy in is equal to pump power.

You could also derive pump power making the assumption that liquid is completely incompressible. In that case, power is work done per unit time so power equals pressure times area times distance divided by time. Here, pressure is the difference in pressure between inlet and outlet, area is inside pipe diameter (ID) and distance divided by time is fluid velocity.

H = W/t = F s / t = dP A s / t = dP A V = dP vdot

Where H = power
W = Work
t = time
F = force
s = distance fluid moves per unit time
dP = pressure increase (discharge minus suction pressure)
A = Area at which distance is measured such as pipe ID
V = s / t = velocity
vdot = A V = volumetric flow rate

I suspect your equation with the 1/2 also provides units and also makes some assumptions. If it were a reciprocating pump for example, we might have a 1/2 put in there by defining flow rate as how much is discharged during the discharge stroke. The 1/2 could be a conversion factor if units were provided. It should explain what assumptions are being made when they write the equation. If not, throw it out, it's not worth it.
 
Yeah, it sure sounds like a conversion factor. In the Fluid Power course I'm curently taking, we use the same formula of pressure times flow rate, but we have to multiply by .000583, because pressure is in "pounds per square inch", and flow rate is in "gallons per minute", and multiplying by .000583 converts the whole mess into Horsepower. (Appearently, it takes .000583 of a horse to move one gallon a minute against one pound per square inch of pressure; though I'd surely like to see him try it!)
 
Thanks for you reply.
But the 1/2 seems not to be a conversion factor since the maximum back pressure and maximum flow rate are used below. I guess it is some reasons behind this because this definition is to be used for evaluating pump performance in general.

Power of the pump = Maximum back pressure * maximum flow rate / 2

There is an assumption, it assumed that the flow rate is a linear function of the load pressure. But I don't know what to do with this assumption..

Please help.
 
hanson said:
There is an assumption, it assumed that the flow rate is a linear function of the load pressure. But I don't know what to do with this assumption..
Where are you getting this? In general, that isn't true (pressure is a square function of velocity), but it doesn't have a lot to do with the problem here.

Can you elaborate on what the book says? Units involved?
 
Actually that is a paper,
it simply says:
In this paper, we recount efficiency
for micropumps for which measured values are specifically
reported. For micropump papers which do not report η but
do report Qmax, delta pmax and P, we use these values to calculate
estimated thermodynamic efficiency, ηest, by assuming that
pump flow rate is an approximately linear function of load
pressure. Estimated thermodynamic efficiency ηest is then
0.25Qmax*delta pmax/P.
 
Hi Hanson.
It looks to me like they're providing some test data, not a method to calculate pump power in general. If you have a paper, feel free to post it. I don't think there's enough information yet to understand what it's all about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K