What is the formula for calculating pump power and efficiency?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the formula for calculating pump power and efficiency, exploring the definitions and assumptions behind these calculations. Participants examine the relationship between maximum back pressure, flow rate, and the factors influencing pump performance, including the implications of using specific formulas in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the formula for pump power, specifically why it includes a division by 2, and whether the power remains constant across different flow rates and back pressures.
  • Another participant explains the concept of a control volume around a pump, detailing the energy inputs and outputs, and suggests that pump power can be derived from the difference in enthalpy.
  • A different participant mentions a conversion factor used in their Fluid Power course, indicating that specific unit conversions are necessary for calculating horsepower from pressure and flow rate.
  • One participant argues that the division by 2 in the formula may not be a conversion factor but rather relates to assumptions about the linearity of flow rate with respect to load pressure.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that flow rate is a linear function of load pressure, noting that pressure typically relates to the square of velocity.
  • A later reply references a paper discussing efficiency for micropumps, indicating that estimated thermodynamic efficiency can be calculated under certain assumptions about flow rate and pressure.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the adequacy of the provided information and suggests that more context or data is needed to fully understand the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the formula and the assumptions behind it. There is no consensus on whether the division by 2 is justified or what assumptions should be made regarding the relationship between flow rate and pressure.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the assumptions made about the linearity of flow rate and pressure, as well as the need for clarity regarding the context in which the formulas are applied. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of efficiency calculations based on specific test data.

hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
How do we define the power of a pump?
I read a formula from a book which defines the power of the pump as follows:

Power of the pump = Maximum back pressure * maximum flow rate / 2

Can anyone explain why the right hand side equals the left hand side?

I don't understand why the LHS is divided by a factor of 2.

And, is the power of a pump always the same value, no matter at any flow rate/back pressure?

It seems to be that at maximum back pressure, the flow rate is zero and the pump power is zero then?

Please help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi hanson,
If you draw a control volume around a pump you'll note the following.
1. There is power going in, in the form of electricity, shaft power or other.
2. There is enthalpy going in. That's your fluid entering the control volume.
3. There is enthalpy leaving. That's your fluid leaving the control volume at a higher pressure.

There could be other forms of energy entering or leaving, but those are the basic ones. For a pump, we generally don't consider aftercoolers part of the pump itself because a pump is for liquids which are relatively incompressible.

Now if you apply the first law to the control volume, you find that the power is equal to the difference in enthalpy. The enthalpy out minus the enthalpy in is equal to pump power.

You could also derive pump power making the assumption that liquid is completely incompressible. In that case, power is work done per unit time so power equals pressure times area times distance divided by time. Here, pressure is the difference in pressure between inlet and outlet, area is inside pipe diameter (ID) and distance divided by time is fluid velocity.

H = W/t = F s / t = dP A s / t = dP A V = dP vdot

Where H = power
W = Work
t = time
F = force
s = distance fluid moves per unit time
dP = pressure increase (discharge minus suction pressure)
A = Area at which distance is measured such as pipe ID
V = s / t = velocity
vdot = A V = volumetric flow rate

I suspect your equation with the 1/2 also provides units and also makes some assumptions. If it were a reciprocating pump for example, we might have a 1/2 put in there by defining flow rate as how much is discharged during the discharge stroke. The 1/2 could be a conversion factor if units were provided. It should explain what assumptions are being made when they write the equation. If not, throw it out, it's not worth it.
 
Yeah, it sure sounds like a conversion factor. In the Fluid Power course I'm curently taking, we use the same formula of pressure times flow rate, but we have to multiply by .000583, because pressure is in "pounds per square inch", and flow rate is in "gallons per minute", and multiplying by .000583 converts the whole mess into Horsepower. (Appearently, it takes .000583 of a horse to move one gallon a minute against one pound per square inch of pressure; though I'd surely like to see him try it!)
 
Thanks for you reply.
But the 1/2 seems not to be a conversion factor since the maximum back pressure and maximum flow rate are used below. I guess it is some reasons behind this because this definition is to be used for evaluating pump performance in general.

Power of the pump = Maximum back pressure * maximum flow rate / 2

There is an assumption, it assumed that the flow rate is a linear function of the load pressure. But I don't know what to do with this assumption..

Please help.
 
hanson said:
There is an assumption, it assumed that the flow rate is a linear function of the load pressure. But I don't know what to do with this assumption..
Where are you getting this? In general, that isn't true (pressure is a square function of velocity), but it doesn't have a lot to do with the problem here.

Can you elaborate on what the book says? Units involved?
 
Actually that is a paper,
it simply says:
In this paper, we recount efficiency
for micropumps for which measured values are specifically
reported. For micropump papers which do not report η but
do report Qmax, delta pmax and P, we use these values to calculate
estimated thermodynamic efficiency, ηest, by assuming that
pump flow rate is an approximately linear function of load
pressure. Estimated thermodynamic efficiency ηest is then
0.25Qmax*delta pmax/P.
 
Hi Hanson.
It looks to me like they're providing some test data, not a method to calculate pump power in general. If you have a paper, feel free to post it. I don't think there's enough information yet to understand what it's all about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K