What is the formula for finding the determinant of a 10x10 matrix?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zythyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Matrix
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix. Participants explore various methods, including row reduction and cofactor expansion, while addressing the challenges associated with calculating such a determinant without numerical methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help with the formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix, expressing uncertainty about row reduction due to a lack of background in Linear Algebra.
  • Another participant suggests that row reduction may be tedious and mentions the possibility of using properties of special matrices to simplify the computation.
  • Several participants propose cofactor expansion as a recursive method for finding determinants, referencing external resources for further explanation.
  • Some participants emphasize the impracticality of calculating the determinant of a 10x10 matrix by hand, suggesting numerical methods instead.
  • One participant notes that deriving a formula for a 10x10 matrix would involve a large number of variables, making it cumbersome and error-prone.
  • Another participant humorously questions the professor's intent behind assigning the task of finding a formula specifically for a 10x10 matrix.
  • A later reply introduces Leibniz's formula for the determinant, indicating a method for expressing the determinant in terms of permutations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the complexity of finding a formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix and the impracticality of doing so by hand. However, there are differing opinions on the feasibility of deriving such a formula and the appropriateness of numerical methods versus symbolic approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of deriving a formula due to the high number of variables involved, as well as the potential for algebraic errors in manual calculations. The discussion does not resolve the question of whether a straightforward formula can be effectively derived.

Zythyr
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out the formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix. I was told to use row reducation method, but I am not really sure what it is. I never took Linear Algebra. Can someone please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's going to be quite tedious even if you were to row-reduce it before finding its determinant. Some special matrices have easy determinants, so maybe you could see if the matrix for which you are trying to evaluate the determinant has some property which allows you to compute its determinant easily.

EDIT: I see that you say you are trying to "figure out the formula". There's a recursive method for finding the determinants of an arbitrary nxn matrix. It's known as cofactor expansion.
 
Last edited:
I know that's not what you are asking for, but in the case of 10x10... go numerical.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Definitely go numerical. It's going to take a long time computing the determinant of that unless it was diagonal.
 
Umm I can't go numerical... I need to do it in terms of formulas... And no, diagonals arent allowed. What can I do? Can someone help me determine the formula? please
 
Put the matrix in a list and use guassian elimination, and sounds like the perfect sort of problem for a functional programming language.
 
The explicit formula for such a matrix will be a horrible, horrible mess (think many many pages).

You are almost guarenteed to make an algebra error somewhere. This is exactly what computers are for.
 
  • #10
Zythyr said:
Umm I can't go numerical... I need to do it in terms of formulas... And no, diagonals arent allowed. What can I do? Can someone help me determine the formula? please
Is this question from a textbook? If so, then perhaps it's best if you were to post the exact problem. The problem with devising a formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix is that it would require far too many variables, at least 100 variables would be needed, each for every entry of the matrix. I doubt any textbook problem would require such to be done.
 
  • #11
Defennder said:
Is this question from a textbook? If so, then perhaps it's best if you were to post the exact problem. The problem with devising a formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix is that it would require far too many variables, at least 100 variables would be needed, each for every entry of the matrix. I doubt any textbook problem would require such to be done.

Not in a textbook. My proffesor for Diffiq said if anyone figures out the forumal for the dertminant of a 10x10, they automatically get an A in the class.
 
  • #12
I'm pretty sure he meant that tongue-in-cheek. To clarify, did you ask him why he wanted only the formula for a 10x10 matrix and not some other arbitrary size?
 
  • #13
If you really want it [and don't want to derive it], you can write a short Maple program.

with(LinearAlgebra); M:=Matrix(3,3,symbol=m); Determinant(M);

You might wish gradually tune the size of the square matrix up to your desired value... but you should be prepared to wait.
 
  • #14
Finding the formula is really simple. You'd just need several pages to write/print it, and there would be 100 variables. So you'd be very likely to make a mistake somewhere if you tried to do it by hand.

I doubt that your professor would actually give an A for it though since it is extremely easy.

Hell, I wonder if this would suffice: (Let [tex]a_{i,j}[/tex] denote the i,jth entry of the matrix)
[tex]\sum_{\sigma \in S_{10}} \text{sgn}(\sigma) \sum_{i=1}^{10} a_{i, \sigma(i)}[/tex]
because that is one way to write the formula. It's called Leibniz's formula for the determinant. Of course you'd need to know what [tex]S_{10}[/tex] is and what the sign of an element of [tex]S_{10}[/tex] means as well as how to interpret the summation signs
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K