What Is the Frequency of Radiation Emitted by a Constantly Accelerating Charge?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the frequency of radiation emitted by a charge that is subjected to constant acceleration along a linear trajectory. Participants explore the implications of acceleration on radiation emission, including concepts of braking radiation and the complexities of hyperbolic motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the frequency of emitted radiation could be 0 Hz, expressing uncertainty about this claim.
  • Another participant counters that 0 Hz does not constitute radiation and asserts that the emitted frequency spectrum depends on the acceleration and speed, which change over time.
  • A participant presents a mathematical model for the acceleration, indicating a constant parameter for acceleration along the x-axis and zero along the y-axis.
  • There is confusion expressed by a participant regarding the nature of the question, emphasizing that an accelerating charge will radiate and may decelerate until stopped or continuously accelerated.
  • A participant highlights the distinction between radiation due to constant acceleration and braking radiation, suggesting that the original post conflates these concepts.
  • Another participant elaborates on the complexities of constant acceleration, noting that it leads to hyperbolic motion and poses challenges in the non-relativistic limit, which could imply faster-than-light motion.
  • This participant references a paper discussing the fields of a charged particle in hyperbolic motion, indicating that the mathematical treatment of this scenario is delicate and requires careful consideration of time intervals.
  • One participant cites a book that discusses braking radiation, suggesting that a pulse of radiation occurs during the event, with a spectrum extending from zero frequency to a maximum frequency determined by the duration of the event.
  • This participant raises a query about the unidirectional nature of the radiated electric field and the implications for radiation at zero frequency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of radiation emitted by a constantly accelerating charge, with no consensus reached on the frequency of this radiation or the relationship between constant acceleration and braking radiation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of acceleration and radiation, as well as the mathematical complexities involved in modeling such scenarios. There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of radiation and the implications of different acceleration conditions.

bocchesegiacomo
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
When a charge is accelerated it brakes because it emits radiation. If a carge is accelerated with costant acceleration and the traiectory is a line what is the frequency of the emitted radiation? (I think 0Hz but i am not sure)
 
Science news on Phys.org
0 Hz is not radiation. The charge will emit some frequency spectrum, the shape depends on the acceleration and the speed (=it changes over time).
 
The acceleration law in this case is:
ax=k
ay=0
Where k is a costant parameter and a is acceleration on the axis x and y
 
? I don't get the question...
if the charged particle is accelerated, it's going to radiate (and decelerate until "stopped" or somehow keep getting accelerated).
 
bocchesegiacomo said:
When a charge is accelerated it brakes because it emits radiation. If a carge is accelerated with costant acceleration and the traiectory is a line what is the frequency of the emitted radiation? (I think 0Hz but i am not sure)

I'm with @ChrisVer . This is very puzzling.

If the charge is accelerating due to some external field, then the charge will radiate due to that acceleration. Without that external agent, the charge won't be accelerating.

Braking radiation happens when the charge is slowing down (decelerating), such as when it enters a material. It is "braking", thus the name.

Your post appears to mix the two, which is very odd.

Zz.
 
Thank you
 
It may sound simple, but in fact it isn't. Constant acceleration means hyperbolic motion (it's hopeless to solve this problem in the non-relativistic limit since then you get faster-than-light motion of the charge, which simply makes no sense in electrodynamics), and the Bremsstrahlung of this motion is mathematically very delicate, because the worldline is asymptotically lightlike. The mathematical solution is physically well understandable: There is no way to really realize this motion but only for a finite time (e.g., approximately by running an electron through a plate capacitor, which always is of finite extent). So you first consider the problem where the particle is at constant proper acceleration for a long but finite time interval and assume that the particle runs as a free particle before and after this time interval and at the end make this time intervall going to the whole real axis. You find the careful analysis in the paper

J. Franklin, D. J. Griffiths, The fields of a charged particle in hyperbolic motion, Am. J. Phys. 82, 755 (2014)
https://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4875195
Erratum: American Journal of Physics 83, 278 (2015)
https://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4906577
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
bocchesegiacomo said:
When a charge is accelerated it brakes because it emits radiation. If a carge is accelerated with costant acceleration and the traiectory is a line what is the frequency of the emitted radiation? (I think 0Hz but i am not sure)
According to my book, Electromagnetic Vibrations, Waves and Radiation, by Bekefi and Barrett, for the case of braking radiation, or Bremsstrahlung, there is a pulse of radiation lasting for the duration of the event, t, and by Fourier analysis it has a uniform spectrum extending from zero frequency to 1/t Hz.
The same must presumably happen with an accelerating particle.
My own query is that the radiated E field appears to be unidirectional and extends to DC, and we cannot have radiation at zero frequency.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K