What Is the Height of a Particle at Momentary Rest After an Inelastic Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ashu2912
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle attached to an ideal string that is released from a height and collides inelastically with a surface. The goal is to determine the height of the particle when it comes to momentary rest after the collision, with specific variables and conditions outlined in the original post.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumptions made regarding the collision type and energy conservation principles. There are attempts to clarify the problem setup and the implications of the string being inextensible. Some participants question the correctness of the derived height and whether there are typos in the problem statement.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem with various interpretations being considered. Some participants have provided guidance on resolving the velocities involved and applying conservation of energy, while others are seeking clarification on the problem description and terminology used.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with a diagram that is referenced but not included in the text. There are mentions of potential typos in the problem statement, and assumptions about energy loss are being debated.

Ashu2912
Messages
106
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


See the attachment for the diagram. 'A' is a fixed point at a height 'H' above a smooth horizontal plane. An ideal string of length 'L' (>H) has one end attached to 'A' and the other to a particle. The particle is held horizontally (the string is taut) and released. The collision between the particle and wall is inelastic. We have to find the height when the particle is at momentary rest again.
I assumed the following unknowns :
'\theta' = The angle shown in the diagram.
'h' = Answer
'v' = Velocity of particle wrt groung just before the collision.
g= Acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface.
Frame of reference = ground (inertial)

Homework Equations


v = (2gH)1/2
The velocity along the common normal just after the collision is 0 and the velocity along the common tangent is vsin\theta, just after the collision. Hence the magnitude of velocity at this point is vsin\theta.
Applying conservation of energy to particle + Earth system just after collision to max. height point,
h = (v sin\theta)2/2g
[External forces do no work]

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer comes out at H3/L2, but the answer given is H5/L4.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Do you think you could type up the problem description exactly as it was posted? I am having trouble picturing what this looks like.
 
Do you think you could type up the problem description exactly as it was posted? I am having trouble picturing what this looks like.

See the images... :smile:
One of them has the question and the other has the diagram...
 

Attachments

  • 2012-07-05 09.14.27.jpg
    2012-07-05 09.14.27.jpg
    31.2 KB · Views: 470
  • 2012-07-05 09.14.50.jpg
    2012-07-05 09.14.50.jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 495
It means that the collision between the particle and the surface is perfectly inelastic.
 
Assuming no energy loss, I also get H3/L2. Hmm...another typo?
 
Hello Ashu2912
The string is inextensible right? So check for the velocity of the rising ball after the collision.From what your picture looks like I assume the ball travels for some distance on the ground with its velocity constrained to be parallel to the ground because the string has slacked.Then as you work out in your attempts it rises up yet again.While rising up resolve the velocities along and perpendicular to the length of the string.Using the fact that the string is inextensible you will have to rule out one component right?(More precisely the fact that string is inextensible and the velocity component acts precisely to increase its length.)Do the new calculations give you the correct answer?(Apply energy conservation after that)

regards
Yukoel
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K