Dropping a Block on a Spring with Completely Inelastic Collision

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of mass, m, dropped from a height, h, onto a plate of mass, M, attached to a spring with spring constant, k. The block sticks to the plate upon impact, leading to oscillations of the combined system. Participants are exploring the energy transformations involved in this completely inelastic collision and the subsequent motion of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy and momentum to analyze the system's behavior post-collision. Questions arise regarding the treatment of gravitational potential energy and its conversion into kinetic and elastic potential energy. Some participants express uncertainty about their assumptions and the reference point for potential energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning each other's reasoning and assumptions about energy conservation. There is a recognition of the need to account for gravitational potential energy as the system compresses the spring. Multiple interpretations of the energy transformations are being explored, and some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of energy conservation in a system involving inelastic collisions and oscillatory motion, with some uncertainty about the reference points for potential energy calculations.

SeventeenForever

Homework Statement

[/B]
A block of mass, m, is dropped from height, h (above the plate), onto a plate of mass, M, which is attached to a spring with spring constant, k. The block sticks to the plate and the system starts to oscillate. What is the amplitude of the oscillations.

Homework Equations


Etotal=K + Ugravitational + Uspring
Uspring=0.5kx2
K=0.5mv2
Ugravitational=mgh
Conservation of Energy

The Attempt at a Solution



I decided to approach this problem from an energy perspective, setting the equilibrium position of the spring (w/ plate) as 0 gravitational potential energy.

The initial gravitational potential energy is Ug=mgh. Just before it hits the plate, all of this gravitational PE is converted to KE.

mgh = 0.5mv2

v= (2gh)0.5

The problem specifically states that the block "sticks" to the plate, suggesting a completely inelastic collision. I can use the conservation of momentum to find the velocity after the collision; after the collision, the velocity of the plate and block is:

vf= m(2gh)0.5 / (m+M)

The kinetic energy of the system is now:

0.5(m+M)vf2 = Kf

The spring will then be compressed from its equilibrium position until the velocity of the plate/block becomes zero, which is the max compression/amplitude. At this point, all of the kinetic energy has been converted to elastic potential energy.

0.5(m+M)vf2 = 0.5kx2

I can then plug in my equation for vf and solve for x, which is the maximum compression/amplitude.

Is this approach okay? Did I make any incorrect assumptions?

Thaaaaaanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SeventeenForever said:
At this point, all of the kinetic energy has been converted to elastic potential energy.
Did gravity mysterously turn off at point of impact?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SeventeenForever
I didn't think about that since I set my reference point to be the equilibrium position of the spring.

So after collision, the gravitational potential energy from the height, h, was either converted to kinetic energy or lost in the inelastic collision. The spring will compress until there is no kinetic energy, but some of this energy will be stored up in gravitational potential energy?

0.5(m+M)vf2=(m+M)gx + 0.5kx2 + 0.5(m+M)(0)2

This would then be a quadratic formula and I could solve for x.

I'm a little hesitant on this approach now since I appear to be gaining gravitational potential energy as the plate/block goes downward. Is this approach at all possible or should I just restart and set the ground as potential energy zero and work from there?

Thanks for the reply!
 
SeventeenForever said:
some of this energy will be stored up in gravitational potential energy?
Er.. no.
As the spring compresses the masses descend. So what is happening to GPE?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SeventeenForever
It would continue to decrease normally. Would it be converted to elastic potential energy as well? I'm getting tripped up since I defined the top of the spring in equilibrium position to be 0 GPE. I suppose it would also decrease in this case too since the height is decreasing and that's what gravitational potential energy does.
 
Correct. The total height for the purpose of calculating GPE is h plus however much the spring compresses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SeventeenForever
So to recap, the kinetic energy that remains is converted to elastic PE. As the masses descend on top of the spring, their potential energies are converted to elastic potential energies as well:

m2gh/(m+M) + max = 0.5kx2
(the m2gh/(m+M) is a simplified kinetic energy term)

This is a quadratic equation I can solve.
 
SeventeenForever said:
So to recap, the kinetic energy that remains is converted to elastic PE. As the masses descend on top of the spring, their potential energies are converted to elastic potential energies as well:

m2gh/(m+M) + max = 0.5kx2
(the m2gh/(m+M) is a simplified kinetic energy term)

This is a quadratic equation I can solve.
Yes (where max=?).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SeventeenForever
My bad; I made a typo. Max should be mgx (autocorrect)
 
  • #10
SeventeenForever said:
Max should be mgx
So, the block is passing through the plate?
 
  • #11
Oh the block and the plate both move downwards. So the amount of potential energy converted is actually (m+M)gh. Thanks for catching that!
 
  • #12
SeventeenForever said:
Oh the block and the plate both move downwards. So the amount of potential energy converted is actually (m+M)gh. Thanks for catching that!
(m+M)gx.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SeventeenForever

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K