What Is the Hydrostatic Force on One End of a Tank Filled with Gasoline?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the hydrostatic force on one end of a tank filled with gasoline, where the tank's ends are defined by the curves y = (1/2)x^2 and y = 12, with a depth of 8 ft of gasoline. The density of gasoline is given as 42.0 lb/ft^3.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration setup for calculating the hydrostatic force and question the use of gravitational constants in different unit systems. There are attempts to clarify the area element dA and its relation to the geometry of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the integration approach and the setup of the problem. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct interpretation of the area element and gravitational constant, with multiple interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of consistent units and the potential need to account for atmospheric pressure in their calculations. There is mention of differing results and the implications of these discrepancies on the overall solution.

sushifan
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
A large tank is designed with ends in the shape of the region between the curves y =(1/2)x^2 and y = 12, measured in feet. Find the hydrostatic force on one end of the tank if it is filled to a depth of 8 ft with gasoline. (Assume the gasoline's density is 42.0 lb/ft^3).

This is a section on applications.

2. Homework Equations

I'm not sure if this is precisely all I need.

Force F = ρgdA (g gravity, d depth, A area)

3. The Attempt at a Solution

(42.0)(9.8) ∫ sqrt(2y) (8-y) dy on [0,8]

823.2 ∫ 8 sqrt(2y) - ysqrt(2y) dy on [0,8]

823.2 [ 16sqrt(2)/3 y^(3/2) - 2sqrt(2)/5 y^(5/2)] on [0,8]

which evaluates to 56, 197.12 lb
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You're mixing metric with imperial if you use 9.8 for g.
 


gneill said:
You're mixing metric with imperial if you use 9.8 for g.

Oh, right! It's 32ft/sec^2, right?
 


sushifan said:
Oh, right! It's 32ft/sec^2, right?

32.174 ft/sec2 :smile:
 


gneill said:
32.174 ft/sec2 :smile:

Is there any way that you can tell me if my solution is in the right direction?
 


sushifan said:
Is there any way that you can tell me if my solution is in the right direction?

Sure. It looks like you've got the right idea for the integration, and the equation being integrated looks appropriate.
 


Hey gneill and sushifan.

Really good problem.


How did you guys get dA as xdy?

My diagram suggests something else.May be am making a mistake :-(
 


emailanmol said:
Hey gneill and sushifan.

Really good problem.How did you guys get dA as xdy?

My diagram suggests something else.May be am making a mistake :-(

I thought of my radius as x units as we traveled vertically on the y-axis, so I rewrote the given function in terms of y.

Could you share your set up of the problem? Maybe it's me who's making the mistake! I'm actually unsure of my solution.
 


emailanmol said:
Hey gneill and sushifan.

Really good problem.How did you guys get dA as xdy?

My diagram suggests something else.May be am making a mistake :-(

The contour is that of a parabola, y = (1/2)x2 . So for a given y (corresponding to some height up from the vertex), the half-width is ##\sqrt{2y}## . The area element dA is then the total width by the height, dy, thus forming a thin rectangular area element. The "2" in "2y" must have units "feet" associated with it in order to keep units consistent.
 
  • #10
sushifan said:
I thought of my radius as x units as we traveled vertically on the y-axis, so I rewrote the given function in terms of y.
Could you share your set up of the problem? Maybe it's me who's making the mistake! I'm actually unsure of my solution.


Firstly, I would take pressure as Po (Atmospheric pressure)
+ phg as its not written to neglect the atmosphere. (Do this only if the answers not matching or not coming twice of what you got with the correct units).

Secondly, my area is coming exactly twice of what you got.(But it maybe wrong.Although I don't know why!)


gneill said:
The contour is that of a parabola, y = (1/2)x2 . So for a given y (corresponding to some height up from the vertex), the half-width is ##\sqrt{2y}## . The area element dA is then the total width by the height, dy, thus forming a thin rectangular area element. The "2" in "2y" must have units "feet" associated with it in order to keep units consistent.


So the area of the small rectangle should be
2*(2y)^1/2*dy .

Right?

And really good observation on the units gneill :-)
 
Last edited:
  • #11


emailanmol said:
Secondly, my area is coming exactly twice of what you got.(But it maybe wrong.Although I don't know why!)

Ah, I have to take the integral twice to cover both sides of the parabola. That's what I forgot.
 
  • #12


Does the answer match?
 
  • #13


emailanmol said:
Does the answer match?

Well I'm not sure what numerical value you got for your answer. You said you got twice my answer; do you mean twice my answer (56, 197.12) from my very first post?

Because that answer was wrong, since I used 9.8 for gravity and not 32.

So, I'm redoing the entire calculation.

It would help if you actually provided your set up or at least your final answer so I can compare.
 
Last edited:
  • #14


No i just got my expression twice as what you got in terms of variables.

I was asking if your answer matches with that of textbook ?

I will post my answer in few mins .Let me calculate :-)
 
  • #15


emailanmol said:
I was asking if your answer matches with that of textbook ?

My textbook unfortunately does not come with an answer key. :[

And I'm doing my calculation right now, too.
 
  • #16


See, i would refrain from posting the answer as its against the Guideline :-)

However,My expression is exactly double of your original post (with proper units of g offcourse)
 
  • #17


emailanmol said:
See, i would refrain from posting the answer as its against the Guideline :-)

However,My expression is exactly double of your original post (with proper units of g offcourse)

Didn't know that. I'm new here.

And apologies for the late reply, I fell asleep.
 
  • #18


sushifan said:
Didn't know that. I'm new here.

And apologies for the late reply, I fell asleep.

It's against the guidelines for those offering help to do the work for, or to simply give answers to the questioner. It's quite okay if the questioner does the work and comes to a correct answer :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K