JohnDubYa
- 468
- 1
omin, do you get extra credit in class for using the word "physics" in your posts?
The discussion centers on the definitions and implications of terrorism, emphasizing its unlawful use of violence by individuals or organized groups to intimidate or coerce societies for political, ideological, or religious purposes. Participants debate the nuances of state-sponsored violence versus terrorism, arguing that both can employ similar tactics but differ in context and motivation. The conversation highlights the complexities of defining terrorism, with some asserting that the legality of actions is determined by the victors of conflicts, while others stress the moral implications of such acts. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards recognizing terrorism as a pervasive tool used by various groups, regardless of their intentions.
PREREQUISITESPolitical scientists, sociologists, law enforcement officials, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of terrorism and its impact on society.
Smurf said:I'm a passifist though, so no matter what they're fighting for I'm still against it.