What is the impact of the Equifax cybersecurity breach on American voters?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stoomart
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the Equifax cybersecurity breach on American voters, particularly focusing on the exposure of sensitive personal information and the subsequent actions individuals can take to protect themselves. Participants explore the potential long-term effects on identity security and the corporate response to the breach.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern over the vast number of individuals affected, noting that nearly every American voter may have had their sensitive information compromised.
  • There are suggestions for protective actions, including monitoring financial accounts, signing up for credit monitoring services, and registering for fraud prevention with reporting agencies.
  • Several participants criticize Equifax for profiting from the breach through their credit monitoring service, which requires a credit card and may automatically convert to a paid service.
  • Some participants speculate that the breach could lead to a shift towards multi-factor identity assurance systems.
  • Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of Equifax's free check service, with claims that it may provide misleading information regarding data exposure.
  • There are allegations regarding insider trading by Equifax executives, with discussions about the timing of stock sales relative to the breach discovery.
  • Participants highlight the potential legal implications of enrolling in Equifax's monitoring service, noting that it may restrict participation in future class-action lawsuits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express dissatisfaction with Equifax's handling of the breach and the adequacy of their response. However, there is no consensus on the effectiveness of the proposed protective measures or the implications of the executives' actions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in the information provided by Equifax's check service, suggesting that it may not accurately reflect the extent of the breach. There are also concerns about the legal language in Equifax's terms of service that could affect individuals' rights.

  • #31
The latest - someone set up a fake Equifax site...and then Equifax linked to it.

So much for "we're sorry...we'll be more careful...this won't happen again..."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
Vanadium 50 said:
The latest - someone set up a fake Equifax site...and then Equifax linked to it.

So much for "we're sorry...we'll be more careful...this won't happen again..."

It's okay. They still have one more strike till they're out.

...we're talking about baseball, right?
 
  • #33
The thing I don't get is the nonchalance of their actual customers. You'd think they would conclude that Equifax's data is unreliable. But somehow they have come to the conclusion that even though Equifax is a collection of incompetent stumblebums, their data on all of us is perfect.
 
  • #34
Vanadium 50 said:
The thing I don't get is the nonchalance of their actual customers. You'd think they would conclude that Equifax's data is unreliable. But somehow they have come to the conclusion that even though Equifax is a collection of incompetent stumblebums, their data on all of us is perfect.
Where does the implication that their data is unreliable come from?
 
  • #35
russ_watters said:
Where does the implication that their data is unreliable come from?

From the conclusion that if a company is sloppy with X it is sloppy with Y. Yes, it's not necessarily true, but it's a good place to make your bet.

Not every Chipolte has a contamination problem. Not every United passenger gets the snot beat out of him. But the companies still took a drubbing.
 
  • #36
Vanadium 50 said:
From the conclusion that if a company is sloppy with X it is sloppy with Y. Yes, it's not necessarily true, but it's a good place to make your bet.

Not every Chipolte has a contamination problem. Not every United passenger gets the snot beat out of him. But the companies still took a drubbing.
Well, those were direct impacts to the customer, so no imagination was required to extend them to broader impact*. So sure, it's reasonable to assume similar sloppiness elsewhere in the business, but someone (or a million separate someones) would have to think of a theoretically possible way a similar sloppiness could harm a customer. I think that's just too indirect.

*And actually, for Chipoltle it is potentially even worse since depending on the cause of the food contamination (I'm not that familiar) it could be that a single failure affects a large number of locations if it happens in the supply chain and not at the restaurant(s).
 
Last edited:
  • #37
IRS awards multimillion-dollar fraud-prevention contract to Equifax
The IRS will pay Equifax $7.25 million to verify taxpayer identities and help prevent fraud under a no-bid contract issued last week, even as lawmakers lash the embattled company about a massive security breach that exposed personal information of as many as 145.5 million Americans.

A contract award for Equifax's data services was posted to the Federal Business Opportunities database Sept. 30 — the final day of the fiscal year. The credit agency will "verify taxpayer identity" and "assist in ongoing identity verification and validations" at the IRS, according to the award.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/03/equifax-irs-fraud-protection-contract-243419
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stoomart

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K